Zardnaar
Legend
EK with Cleric Initiate.
Can be done. Can't be assumed. I woukd probably pick shield of faith instead tbh.
EK with Cleric Initiate.
I mean, or you could just play a paladin…Can be done. Can't be assumed. I woukd probably pick shield of faith instead tbh.
I mean, or you could just play a paladin…
Here you goWe started watching them last night. No sorcerer.
Anyone with Cleric Initiate, but let's compare.EK with Cleric Initiate.
Paladin: lay on hands = 50hp at level 10.I mean, or you could just play a paladin…
that is true.You personally hating it doesn’t make it bad.
You are correct that Disengage from an enemy isn't going to come up very often, but I think you missed the fact that the THP doesn't go away when the spell ends.that is true.
I personally hate the "hunter's mark class", formally known as the ranger.
And just because I hate it personally, does not make me wrong.
this whole debate would be non issue if Ranger's got the option for HMJust free cast HM at the start of the day, drop concentration, and carry on with your THP.
"Hunters Mark Class" at least has a meaning. Everyone knows Ranger should be a background not a class (Aragon was a paladin).that is true.
I personally hate the "hunter's mark class", formally known as the ranger.
And just because I hate it personally, does not make me wrong.
I agree, but also:"Hunters Mark Class" at least has a meaning. Everyone knows Ranger should be a background not a class (Aragon was a paladin).
Plus all their spell slots that could be used for healing.Paladin: lay on hands = 50hp at level 10.
