D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting

[Maxperson]

It seems you're focusing a bit too much on the specific example. It's about: "Hey, this is a place and role this PHB core species can be found in and has a relevant contribution to the adventure locations of that setting that you can use to find something to base your character of one of those PHB core species."

If there aren't enough Dragonborn on the planet for every major city to have a Dragonborn [something], but there are human [same something] in almost every major city, your setting seems insufficient to be that 5.24 setting.

And mind you, it's perfectly fine if Forgotten Realms isn't that "optimized for 5.25" setting. It doesn't need to be bend to be so unless you want to. But I think a setting that is designed with the PHB core races and classes first and foremost in mind would be something interesting to have.

I see nothing in the 5.5e PHB indicating that all races are or should be equally prevalent in a setting.

 

[Corinnguard]

I see nothing in the 5.5e PHB indicating that all races are or should be equally prevalent in a setting.

What would the players gain if all of them were equally prevalent in a setting? The fact that they are already a part of that setting's standard line-up of PC species should be all that matters when choosing one of them for your character. You choose a species and pick a place within the setting for them to hail from.

 

[CreamCloud0]

What would the players gain if all of them were equally prevalent in a setting? The fact that they are already a part of that setting's standard line-up of PC species should be all that matters when choosing one of them for your character. You choose a species and pick a place within the setting for them to hail from.

equal opportunity relevancy for whatever PHB species they want to pick, if i want to pick a dragonborn i don't have to grasp for scraps of local setting lore interesting or relevant to my character while the human, elf and dwarf are swimming in more options that they care to know what to do with.

 

[Paul Farquhar]

equal opportunity relevancy for whatever PHB species they want to pick, if i want to pick a dragonborn i don't have to grasp for scraps of local setting lore interesting or relevant to my character while the human, elf and dwarf are swimming in more options that they care to know what to do with.

I still don’t understand what this is supposed to mean. The setting lore isn’t tied to any specific species.

 

[CreamCloud0]

I still don’t understand what this is supposed to mean. The setting lore isn’t tied to any specific species.

try saying that to all the organizations that are 90% humans or the elven village in the forest.

 

[Corinnguard]

equal opportunity relevancy for whatever PHB species they want to pick, if i want to pick a dragonborn i don't have to grasp for scraps of local setting lore interesting or relevant to my character while the human, elf and dwarf are swimming in more options that they care to know what to do with.

Maybe it would help if you told me what options humans, elves and dwarves get to enjoy that aren't available to Dragonborn.

 

[Paul Farquhar]

try saying that to all the organizations that are 90% humans or the elven village in the forest.

I’m a Dragonborn who lives in a 99% human city (90% it way too low for FR, and Greyhawk is 99.9% human). My friends, colleagues, boss, etc are human, because that’s the population demographic. So what? I don’t see how that makes any difference.