Not unless they're part of the adventure. I'm just saying "this is a medieval world" isn't a good reason. Even in the early modern world CCTV systems didn't exist, not until World War 2.
Well that's nonsense. We all like what we like, but you're taking art from an adventure that takes place in a particular time, setting, and even at a particular event and acting like that's just... what D&D is these days? Can you not see now disingenuous that comes across?
Edit: It's like...
But who considers it unusual? Presumably... high heels(?) or whichever other modern anachronism that supposed D&D purists want to make their hill to die on this time... aren't out of the ordinary for the world this adventure takes place in.
A Lightning Rail would be remarkable on Greyhawk but...
You know, going back to the original post, you could probably find a random illustration from an adventure from any era of the game and just as easily have people saying "What does this have to do with D&D?"
Heck, Barrier Peaks had robots. D&D has always contained multitudes.
Honestly I'd prefer to keep it in D&D or at least a 5E derivative like Tales of the Valiant, if only because I don't have much interest in Daggerheart.
That said I'm sure I'll watch it regardless.
My understanding is, the ORC does what it does because so many people using the OGL just declared everything, including game mechanics, as product identity. The ORC's lack of wiggle room was specifically designed to keep the chain of open content open. The fact that it requires a lot more of...
It's kind of incredible how the release of the SRD into Creative Commons not only ended the OGL crisis but took the legs out from under the ORC License as well. I had planned to start publishing under ORC but