I can see this being a downside of listening to the audiobooks, when the rules stuff goes on a little too long in the books you can just skip to the next paragraph.
No, I'm not missing his point. I don't know how to communicate more clearly that I understood his point (which isn't even a complicated enough one that it would be reasonable to accuse someone of not getting) or that what I'm taking away is not what he intended to say, considering I explicitly...
Like I said, I understand it's a personal exploration of his feelings, so the things that are off putting to me aren't intended. I don't even disagree with most of what he says here. It's just, for me, very difficult to separate the fact that his core struggle with AI is that it denies people...
I am a pretty anti AI art person, so I'm primed to agree with him, but my overall reaction to this speech is negative. I recognize this was mostly about his personal introspection, and not a fleshed out argument, but there's something about the way he invokes John Henry here, and how be...
This has always been my issue with it. It's fine to define a word a certain way in an academic framework but trying to remove that framework and force it into the real world, especially when that word is already being used colloquially, is usually not going to work.
Just thinking things and moving on from them is, imo, a great skill that people my age and younger were disinclined to learn growing up with social media. I am...I won't say I'm doing a lot better as I've rediscovered the ability but it has made a noticeable difference in my moods.