Recent content by Kevmann10583

  1. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    No, I don't think it should be left to the DM, especiialy since there are alot of inexperianced DMs that would have no way of making it. If they can put the witch class in their then they can damn well put the paladin prc.
  2. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    So you at least agree that the paladin as a prc should be a varient rule stated in the DMG?
  3. K

    Paladin, Core or Prc, the final word!

    Come on, 13 votes untill 200. But I think we can all agree by these results, there is a significant portion of people that think it should be a prc. I think Wizards should at least put it in the variation section of the book.
  4. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    And I do agree, somtimes the paladin will be somehow, someway forced into breaking a commandment. Unfortuantly, I still think they would have to get atonement to gain their powers back. This is just what I think the champions of law and good would follow.
  5. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    Sejs, If they are unaware of the law they can not be held accountable. I do not know a single medieval town that has littering as a law. Some places have strange and exotic customs and laws (no red hats on Tuesdays) then yes, the paladin should compensate for them. And as for your last...
  6. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    The main weakness of your argument, Kamikaze Midget, is that all of those classes are general classes that have hardly any restrictions. The paladin is the exact opposite of what a core class should be, it is very restrictive, and in most cases is very difficult to play correctly. That is the...
  7. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    OK, for all of you who think paladins in my world somhow are constantly killed off or who is confused about my code system for paladins, here are my ten commandments: This is my ten commandments of paladins. 1. Must abide by all laws. The only time they can go against the law, ANY law, is if...
  8. K

    Paladin, Core or Prc, the final word!

    hey wow, I wonder if we can get to 200 votes? Well, in any case, I guess the majority want it to stay just as it is.
  9. K

    IQ to INT equivalent

    But I took the ACT, how does that compare?!?
  10. K

    IQ to INT equivalent

    Yea, I prefer the Int x 10 = IQ I like it alot!
  11. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    Wow, Sigil, well said!
  12. K

    Paladin, Core or Prc, the final word!

    Oh yea, and here is an example of a holy warrior replacement class: THE DIVINE CHAMPION
  13. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    Thank you Hypersmurf, I completly agree!
  14. K

    Paladins in 3.5, why?

    Sure, why not? The person could of course specialize in the chosen field like a normal wizard. But I would like to se a prc for every school specialization, with the requirement that that wizard specializes in said school when he took the wizard class.
  15. K

    Paladin, Core or Prc, the final word!

    Acctualy, it is more like 61% would like to see it stay as a core class, and 33% would like to see it as a prc. That is more then 1/3, I think that is a significant amount to mabie change something about the paladin.
Top