• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

WotC has a milking machine now (Draconomicon I)

Ulthwithian

First Post
Something I have not seen pointed out in this thread so far is that we know that Metallic and Chromatic dragons will have very different powers based on their MO; that is, Metallic Dragons are more domineering and control-oriented, while Chromatic Dragons are more destructive. This gives one good reason to 'split up' the two different dragon types; everything derived from them will have these 'feels'.

Another point is that even with the changes to 4E, I'd be willing to wager that most people will still see Metallic Dragons as 'good'. Therefore, WotC caters to these people as well as the people who buy into the changes by releasing a book that is 6 less pages than the 3.X Draconomicon and yet gives roughly twice the detail on the Dragons that are more likely to be encountered by adventurers.

They can do this, and still maintain the bottom line of profit-based enterprise. Everyone wins.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

MaelStorm

First Post
Ulthwithian said:
Something I have not seen pointed out in this thread so far is that we know that Metallic and Chromatic dragons will have very different powers based on their MO; that is, Metallic Dragons are more domineering and control-oriented, while Chromatic Dragons are more destructive. This gives one good reason to 'split up' the two different dragon types; everything derived from them will have these 'feels'.

Another point is that even with the changes to 4E, I'd be willing to wager that most people will still see Metallic Dragons as 'good'. Therefore, WotC caters to these people as well as the people who buy into the changes by releasing a book that is 6 less pages than the 3.X Draconomicon and yet gives roughly twice the detail on the Dragons that are more likely to be encountered by adventurers.

They can do this, and still maintain the bottom line of profit-based enterprise. Everyone wins.

As stated in W&M both metallic and chromatic dragons needs to be defined further than 6 pages in a MM. That part I agree. But couldn't they do it in only one Dragon book? Why?
 

MaelStorm

First Post
Ulthwithian said:
Something I have not seen pointed out in this thread so far is that we know that Metallic and Chromatic dragons will have very different powers based on their MO; that is, Metallic Dragons are more domineering and control-oriented, while Chromatic Dragons are more destructive. This gives one good reason to 'split up' the two different dragon types; everything derived from them will have these 'feels'.

Another point is that even with the changes to 4E, I'd be willing to wager that most people will still see Metallic Dragons as 'good'. Therefore, WotC caters to these people as well as the people who buy into the changes by releasing a book that is 6 less pages than the 3.X Draconomicon and yet gives roughly twice the detail on the Dragons that are more likely to be encountered by adventurers.

They can do this, and still maintain the bottom line of profit-based enterprise. Everyone wins.

I know you gave good reasons and I don't disagree with your idea that we win. But still I think it could have been done in one book. You think good and evil dragon deserve two different book, maybe but that is not a good reason for me, but I respect you.
 

Seems like a good idea to release a book on the popular subject of dragons sooner rather than later in the life of 4th edition. What's the big fuss about?

And speaking for myself, I'd buy a 3.5 book on gem dragons the day it came out. I might even buy a 4th edition version (Draconomicon 3 in 2010?) for use in my 3.5 games.
 

Imperialus

Explorer
Cadfan said:
I don't care about the Draconomicon 47 and definitely won't be buying it.

But I have friends who will buy it and enjoy it greatly.

For some reason, this doesn't fill me with rage. I must be interwebbing wrong.

You're doing it wrong!
 

Attachments

  • wrong20.jpg
    wrong20.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 78


Kishin

First Post
I don't see the real reason for shock, surprise and outrage at this. In all honesty, folks, the writing on the walls wasn't even writing in this case: It was a big flipping pulsating neon sign that read: "Lo, and there shall be splatbooks."

I'm not quite ready to fire the missiles over this without further information. Plus, I loved the Draconomicon, so if they can repeat even some of its charm, I'm all for it.

That said, I think we need to turn this thread more toward discussions of dragon hybridization vis-a-vis the Wang Chung Dragon.
 

Dausuul

Legend
Derren said:
In 4E WotC splits the concept of the Draconimicon into several books, each with a $40 price tag. You have Draconomicon I for chromatic dragons, and probably Draconomicon II for metallics. After that there will maybe come Draconomicon III Gem Dragons, Draconomicon IV Everything else Dragons and Draconomicon V Everything else we left out in the previous book Dragons.

Well, since I never use metallic dragons, the prospect of a chromatics-only Draconomicon suits me just fine. I can buy Draconomicon I and actually get full value out of it.
 

dm4hire

Explorer
Dragons are no longer tied to alignment per WotC. So the purpose of separating chromatic from metallic would be to distinguish the differences between how they act as mentioned earlier with the chromatic being more chaotic in nature while metallics are more calculating in what they do. Then again that doesn't have to be the norm for individual dragons.
 

Mistwell

Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
Doug McCrae said:
There were five books about dragons in 3e.

Draconomicon
Races of the Dragon
Dragon Magic
Dragons of Faerun
Dragons of Eberron

Indeed. I was thinking this simply implied either fewer books on the topic, or more organized ones in the very least!
 

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top