WotC New WotC Statement on Orion Black


log in or register to remove this ad

tl;dr Orion felt they were brought on as part of a serious push to improve D&D's Diversity and Inclusion. Instead, Orion ran up against an insiders-only culture that Orion felt only brought them on to improve their image rather than make actual change. Furthermore, Orion felt that leadership was inadequately supporting the actual work they did, both through a lack of assignments and through stolen credit. This capped off with WotC's "Diversity" statement that was in part a response to controversies around Orc representation, which Orion publicly criticized as all talk no action. Orion's freelance contract wasn't renewed, which Orion claimed was retaliation for going public with concerns that had been ignored in private forums.

Thanks. That's not too far off from the bits and pieces I had put together.

Honestly, sounds to me like a story with no bad guys and no good guys. WotC could do more for diversity and may have partially hired Orion for diversity's sake. OTOH, Orion's complaint's about not being able to publicly post things that aren't aligned with the company and not getting enough attention as a contractor sounds like someone who might be a little naive about working with larger corporate entities. The biggest rifts seems more like a business culture mismatch than anything else.
 

Mention in an earnings call is not reason to expect they're engaging on the level of what contractors work on which projects, as Orion described, especially when the brand is doing fantastically well, from a historical perspective. I don't think the products they put out have shown signs of that kind of micromanagement from distant corporate overlords.
Not true, if this becomes an investor relations problem and a brand problem, corporate will micromanage.
 


Honestly, sounds to me like a story with no bad guys and no good guys. WotC could do more for diversity and may have partially hired Orion for diversity's sake. OTOH, Orion's complaint's about not being able to publicly post things that aren't aligned with the company and not getting enough attention as a contractor sounds like someone who might be a little naive about working with larger corporate entities. The biggest rifts seems more like a business culture mismatch than anything else.

Orion's account paints a fairly grim picture of corporate culture at WOTC, hence their flippant response. Here is the previous thread about it:

 

neobolts

Explorer
Do not go on Twitter unless you want the dumbest hot takes from all corners. I'm used to the bigots (that Morrus rightfully shows the door), but there is also some ridiculous performance outage out there. I'm socially liberal, but some of ideas floated are not helpful or substantive. Don't tell me how kobolds are being marginalized, that's not "it". I'm also seeing minor publishers and podcasters with big egos. They'd have you believe WotC is dead to 99% of fans, but that doesn't square with sales at all.
 

The chances of a company admitting fault (and liability) in a situation like this seems pretty unlikely. I'm sure all sorts of lawyers went over this first. Though it's certainly undermined by not directly contacting Orion T. Black first, this is still a stronger, more specific statement than I would've expected. But as others have said, the test of it will be what actions Wizards actually takes. Considering Orion T. Black's response, though, I'd say that it's unlikely that Wizards will ever work with them again.
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
Not true, if this becomes an investor relations problem and a brand problem, corporate will micromanage.

I think you misunderstand. Orion Black said that they were passed over for projects. I'm saying that's unlikely to have been Hasbro's fault.

The solution could come from a Hasbro suit coming in and saying, "Stop being idiots and get some real diversity in here!" But how far up the chain you have to go to find the problems is not that high - you could find the problem and solution within WotC itself, and if you did, Hasbro would be fine with that.
 

I think you misunderstand. Orion Black said that they were passed over for projects. I'm saying that's unlikely to have been Hasbro's fault.
I agree in the past, but the current actions and responses being taken do have more of a corporate stamp. Hence getting the product name wrong in the disclaimer. That would include micromanaging staff now.
 

Sounds like someone actually decided to listen to Greg Tito on the issue - he said he'd been trying to get them to see sense for ages.

It's typical corporate stuff but any kind of acknowledgement and apology is better than stark silence. It's probably got to be a little better for Orion too, it's not what it could be but basic public acknowledgement can mean a lot in this kind of situation.
Unfortunately, corporations and professionals get punished for apologizing because it can suggest legal liability. Hence, the silence.

Every once in while, the political wisdom kicks in, that if all else fails, admit guilt and "repent".

There must be a better way for our culture to deal with these situations?
 

Remove ads

Top