Shardstone
Hero
Take away two ASIs, add two more subclass features to base, and customizing fighter gets way easierUse subclasses.
Have Realistic Fighter subclasses, then have fun ones.
Take away two ASIs, add two more subclass features to base, and customizing fighter gets way easierUse subclasses.
Have Realistic Fighter subclasses, then have fun ones.
yeah, if anyone from WoTC is listening(reading) give us 2 months of weekly UA with different warriors with different levels of complexity and power... get the feed back then make a follow (maybe 4-6months later) and that would be great.The more think about this, the more I like Mort's idea of WotC releasing a bunch of UA material on it to let players and DMs playtest the Dickens out of it and then post public comments on their observed results. It helps not just with questions like "Are these class-types imbalanced?" and, assuming they are, "How best could we rebalance them?," but also with Asisreo's original question of "What are the best reasons for thinking they are excessively imbalanced or thinking they aren't?" Because in a sense, aren't these all ultimately empirical questions, not theoretical ones? And if so, wouldn't an empirical study be the way to answer them?
That's my current post-coffee thinking, anyway.
how is gonzo not as insulting?Um. Can we not have "realistic" as opposed to "fun" here? I see the distinction you're making, but there are (one must presume) people who find the more realistic approaches to be "fun." Perhaps "gonzo" as an alternative?
Normal is not the antonym of fun, while gonzo can be a lot of fun, depending on your definition of fun.how is gonzo not as insulting?
I have never seen "gonzo" used to describe a TRPG in an insulting manner. I have seen people not prefer it, but that's not the same thing.how is gonzo not as insulting?
It's insulting the right people.how is gonzo not as insulting?
how is gonzo not as insulting?
Normal is not the antonym of fun, while gonzo can be a lot of fun, depending on your definition of fun.
I have never seen "gonzo" used to describe a TRPG in an insulting manner. I have seen people not prefer it, but that's not the same thing.
You know what I am sick of this...It's insulting the right people.
no gonzo means crazy... and I am very upset that now a mod is adding to the insult.