Masters of the Universe | Official Trailer

But back to Masters of the Universe. The trailer left me cold. Eternia just looks like too much CGI. I really wish people would just build models and sets again. Yes, CGI is generally cheaper, but having some sense of physicality, especially in genre works, provides a grounding action, and just plain looks better.
From what I read, they actually used a lot more practical effects than most movies, including physical sets. But maybe this is like everyone being convinced that everything nowadays is AI even when it's not?

Needs more skeletor.
I will admit that Jared Leto remains my biggest question mark about this movie.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Same.

A lot of actors I like involved, and er... Jared Leto, who is a giant red flag in human form.
Yeah, I do not understand how Jared Leto still gets work. He's not a huge draw, his method acting nonsense rarely delivers performances to justify it, and on top of all that there are multiple credible allegations against him.

But the whole thing looks bland and sauceless as as hell, and the heavy use of cheap CGI is definitely part of that - it's both a difference in look and a difference in mindset. Even if you don't go full physical, going at least as physical as you practically can (as the D&D movie arguably did) gives a different vibe, and tends to be linked to movies which have more sauce, more vim, more vigor, more je ne sais quoi (the D&D movie had sauce, not buckets of it, but it had it - Jarnathan, completely insane Bradley Cooper cameo, etc. etc.). It's just like, the sort of producers and directors who sign off on going that hard on CGI... they're just not people with sauce.
There's a sense of reality to it. It's in the lighting, the shadows, the way the actors perform and interact with the environment.

Compare this:

1769202134143.png

1769202442921.png

With this:
1769202234429.png


1769202388527.png


From what I read, they actually used a lot more practical effects than most movies, including physical sets. But maybe this is like everyone being convinced that everything nowadays is AI even when it's not?
Looking at the few set photos out there (see above), it seems like they used more practical suits and armor, but still did just the bare minimum for their sets.
 


I will admit that Jared Leto remains my biggest question mark about this movie.

The great thing about Jared Leto's acting is
At this point Leto is pretty much the heel of Hollywood. Nearly every trailer has that moment and its hilarious.

"Hmm, a new trailer... oh this looks good....Wait...wait whats that music?...No, it cant be.... Is it really true!?"
At some point the music in the trailer stops and plays Leto's entrance music like a WWE interrupt.
jared leto joker GIF
 



Odd. I have a weird thing with MotU. I've got like no connection with the franchise. And at the same time I'm too deep into it for someone who isn't into it.

I mean, I hold no love for the cartoon. To me it was always this old boring thing that just kept rerunning for no reason. I also had vague memories of the New Adventures cartoon that looked way better. I also watched the movie on TV a few times. Until the Netflix documentary I didn't even know there were toys!

And well, the CGI cartoon was cute, and I almost bought the Greyskull castle in clearance a few years back. (I'm a sucker for fantasy. A castle is a castle is a castle) And if I found a reaction figure in 'the wild' or a 200x 4" figure, I'd buy it. But I could equally go the rest of my life not caring if it doesn't happen. (In general, I collect the 3.75-4 inch scale as a whole)

I don't know if I'll watch this movie. If it happens, it'll happen. If not, I'm not going out of the way to watch it the way I was for D&D:HAT on the opening week.
 

Remove ads

Top