Search results

Just got back from it. The only thing I didn't like was the emotional scenes seemed to drag on. I like action, and story, but I think the hand holding and the staring wass just a tad bit too long. Otherwise it was AWESOME. I even liked the slo-mo fighting bits, better than I liked em in...

This is exactly what I don't want. If I had wanetd to just let it go by the rules, and have raise dead be common, then I would not have started this thread. Instead I want to change it, and was looking for ideas to help. I got some great ones, so it looks like the whole point of the thread...

Been working on the class, and realized some things. First, I had thought that the flaming and burst damage from a flaming weapon were not mutiplied with a crit. If so, that would make the aim ability too powerful. Also Field of fire dosen't work like I wanted it too. I am thinking about...

Having the chance of failure for comming back to life is a good idea. It will add some more risk, making the characters less willing to die, but won't make things come down to a die roll. Now it will be two die rolls, hehe. Plus I can modify the chance based on what they did. I like that...

I like some of the idea, but how do you deal with the issue that it is so easy to get killed. I mean, my players are pretty smart about getting into situation they cant get out of. They always leave a way out, and set themselves up in a way that lessens the danger as much as they can, but...

I have a problem with the way raise dead is handled in 3rd edition. If this has been brought up before, I am sorry for the rehash, I haven't read anything on it yet though. With the raise dead spell and the resurrection spell, it seems that dying isn't quite the penalty. There are times my...

Sorry to get off the subject here. This quote just scared me. Hmm, sound like some bigotry here. "It that trailer park guy goes out with that 40 year old, then it makes all of us look bad. We shouldn't give him the means to do that" Hmm, in this case it is simply by not statting the books...

Here is how I would do it. It you haD A 20' TENTECLE FOR EXAMPLE, i WOULD SAY THAT IT WOULD LOOK CUT OFF FROM THE POINT OF THE ANTIMAGIC FIELD. aLMOST LIKE YOU TURNED THAT PART OF IT INVIS, BUT IT WOULD BE GONE. iF YOU WERE CLOSE ENOUGH (srry caps) that your real arm was sticking through...

That is a real good point, and something I was thinking about. My pc that want's to take it is a ranger. He is taking levle of fighter to get into it. I would have loved to give up that restriction, but that would make improved specialization different. It would probably give specialization...

dangit messed up I just realized something else. I didn;t know that you needed to be within 30 feet for the +2 on weap special, until it was pointed out above. (good thing none of my players have taken that yet, It would have been a messup). For improved weapon specialization, I am thinking...

last reply dissapeared. About armor, I meant light. I figure he has to be able to move to stay out of melee. As for endurance, (doh) just some old 2ed thinking. The save progression should be as normal with a good reflex save and fort save. I didn't have the book when I did it, and...

First time I tried that, and not sure how it will work, so here it is in text form just in case. The Archer Don’t move or my arrow will find your heart. Requirements To qualify for an archer the character must meet all of the following criteria: Base Attack Bonus: +5 Feats: Weapon Focus (any...

I didn't like any of the ones in the books (don't get me wrong, I did like them, but not for the character my player wants) so I came up with this. What do you think?

yo. eyes comes here from mass. The home of boston. We aint got no potatoes (hehe) and no freaking hot bogs, but what wees got is cofee milk, choricio, and drugs. Lots a drugs. some gangs stuff too, and a few guns. I think you gotta let us into this post, or you aint gonna like what happens.

Wake up magus This is just something I remebered hearing. If everyone around you has the problem. The problem is you When you look around and see enemies every, your the one in the wrong place. When everyone around you is wrong, you are the one confused. Lead me to a joke. A women hears...

Ah, I would remove charge from above. It isn't a standard action, it is a special attack action. Sorry.

One of the biggest problems here is people just can't seem to understand the concept of the actions (Not alot, but a few). Maybe you should think of it a different way. Think of it like this. A standard action is just that. An action. An attack, drinking a potion, etc. Anytime you take a...

That is how it makes sense to me also. The +8 is figured into the class. You get it piece by peice, so when you enlarge, you do not get it again. At least that is how I read it. I have a player who is taking a prestige class based on the dragon disciple. It give magical abilities rather...

I am just surprised that this went 4 pages. Dang, I wanted to say something about a standard action not being split up. A standard action INCLUDES a move. (which you can replace with a move eq. action) I know it has been said already I am sure (on page three, I couldn't belive people were...

Well, I'll put my 15 cents in. First, I am a DM, and in my party, I have several evil characters and good ones. I have a greedy ranger who thinks he is neutral, but turned evil, when he sold some innocent souls to a demon. I have a neutral drow, who is bloodthirsty, and I have NE assassin...