Search results

You mean you don't use them now? ;) Just to clarify: We have two sets of rules currently in development. A Soft-Focus and a Hard-Focus. Both rules sets (as I see it) are going to be presented in full. The Soft-Focus rules are to see the quick results of one encounter without much rolling or...

Just use the sex trick list in the posts before it as the Trick list, it's far more comprehensive. ;) We have a few, but some major edits have to be done.

Gee, seems like we have had some debate. :) Sorry if I got a little over-zealous on the feat conversion. I still think some of them are a good idea. Wrayven's Opinion: I think we should stick with the basic rules and a perform-esque Prowess skill. However, I think a side bar than mentions an...

Sexual Prowess (if it be Perform-eqse) should have all the same categories as are listed in the Kinks sections. I think all these feats are good: Aroused Casting [Metamagic], Body to Die For [General], Coitus of Power [Metamagic], Conductive Kiss [Metapsionic], Control Arousal [Psionic]...

"My goodness, I’m used to dispensing compliments, not receiving them!" ;) Well I guess this is my opinion and I'll respond to all because I think somethings are relavant to most of the issues at hand. 1) Conditional Modifiers I love em. Use em! ;) 2) "first I think the GUCK rules should not...

As much as I like them, I think we need to stay away from the whole advantages/disadvantages thingy. It just isn't very 3e'ish... However... I agree, kinks should be Sex Tricks. I think it should be given that if any activity is a part of an encounter that one partner doesn't like, a -1 to -10+...

I'm sure we would all love to see. However, we are still a little ways away from that point (i.e. still getting our core mechanic, skills, ad such complete before moving on to anything else. ;)) But feel free to discuss anything you like. As Promised: Okay. Here is what I was thinking for the...

;) I'm glad it was a pleasant weekend. As to the revisions. I'm breathless. You sure can sum up and edit. I love all the changed (even the axing of Over-Stimulated). I can't find any errors off-hand or even anything I think is off. Any for extra changes? Or should be finalize this core part and...

We have to just wait for Death By Surfeit to finish that big ol' post he's going to do (thanxs again). After that we can look at the whole thing and finalize it. Then follow that nifty action plan until completion. ;)

Anabstercorian: Awww... Does that mean I wasn't geeky enough to get it in the first place <pout> ;) Thank you for the kind words. Just two quick thoughts. 1) Do we let the character choose which ability score they can use for a prowess roll? Or should it still require a sex trick? And, should...

::blush:: Why thank you. ;) ...(piszt! What does |_33x mean?) That sir, is an excellent idea. And I like the cut of your numbers better than mine. :) Of course. ;) I know I've had some... (oh well OT...) Just let us know if we can help (hope everything works out for you ;)) And if I...

Hmmm... On second thought I don't like that Core Mechanic... The reduction of a Fort save could make an encounter last forever with target DCs in the 15s... So... Core Mechanic (Hard Focus) In order to stimulate a partner successfully, a charactrer must make a prowess check. The DC for this...

Core Mechanic (Hard Focus) In order to stimulate a partner successfully, a charactrer must make a prowess check. The DC for this check varries by the current condition of the partner. If the character fails to meet the required DC, they may elect to status the status of their partner to any DC...

Revised Conditions: The Physiological Conditions (Physical Conditions no longer stack... I.E. A character is either Aroused, Peaked, Climaxed, or in Ecstasy, not any combination thereof.) Aroused Aroused characters are physically aroused and ready for sex. Males become erect and females...

Good ideas. And more balanced too. ;) I'll start a write up and a reworking of the two status conditions so that we'll have something a little more solid to look at. Maybe I'll try and rewrite that one too. ;) :eek: Well I suppose if we must... ;) So... ::looks around:: Have we decided on...

Hmmm... Maybe this one isn't so good... I'll toss it out there anyway just to see what you guys think: Basics: Every round spent in the climax condition exacts a toll on the character. Each round spent in Ectasy counts as two rounds spent in climax. A freash character can take a number of...

Thanks, Kolvar. I have thought this as well. I just thought the two needed to be seperate and stackable. Any fixes, anyone? I too have seen this as an issue. The same goes for subdual magic casting systems... Perhaps we should cap it at a specific ammount? Or... we could introduce a sexual...

I love it! I think you should use it! Perhaps some really good flavor text or a good quote could be added as well. I've developed a similar feat in the past. Maybe we can combine the two. Feat: SoulMate (General) Your heart belongs to that of another and theirs is yours. Your bond is somewhat...

I can relate and understand completly. :) Point 1) I'm in agreement with Masturbation rules. I think there should be a way to try to partners at once. At this point... I'm thinking all rolls should be penalized by a single modifier (say -4 to -8 range for 2 partners?) This brings up another...

In Reply: "One suggestion though: if you get a penalty to saves for [Arousal] type spells, how about increased caster level or save DC's on spells of that type you cast in that state? Sort of a "fueled by your own lust" kind of thing." I like DbS's take on it. ;) In Reply: "Some very good...