Search results

Stacie, your proposal is great! Thank you very much! I am going to tie that mechanic into the system, but it seems it would not be a hard work. As long as I finish, I will provide a link to the updated doc. Feel free to comment anything else you find interesting or improvable.

Thank you for the suggestions, but my main concern is still to distinguish between fast and slow creatures, a thing that abstract systems can not do well. Eg. an halfling can be at short range with a T-Rex (the halfling can charge the enemy), but the T-Rex will be at close range or even adjacent...

Here are the others document translated so far; they are still works in progress and might not be up to date, so take them with a pinch of salt ;) COMBAT CONDITIONS HEALTH & HITPOINTS FEATS ROGUE FIGHTER WEALTH

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT Here is the character development document. Now I am confronting the little I translated with the original docs, checking for differences between the two and correcting them. Sparse Notes There are three classes (or advancement patterns): Fighter, Rogue & Erudite. Skill...

Goodmorning to all of you! I'm here asking for help for a project that unfortunately has recently grown stale. About eighteen months ago, I wanted to try my personal version of the most famous OGL system. I started some topics on an italian forum, and gauged some interest from the users. As I...

I've only skimmed through it, but it seems not so simple as I'd like. If you limit only to 1 attack per round, consider another option: when the character would be able to make 2 attacks, her attack deals 2[w], when 3 attacks --> 3[w] and so on.

The best I can think of is to have only one attack, with increasing bonus to damage based on level (or BAB); two weapons let you choose which to use and give you a little damage bonus.

I can speak only for myself, so basically everything I say is only my huble opinion ;)

Quoting Pawsplay, I'd ditch it. If transparency is the rule, I think there's no need of another skill, given that Path is reducing the number of skills condensating them. BTW, have you never thought about making some alternate spellcasters with spellpoints (I know there's something in UA, but...

I'd just ditch integrated spellcasting and give more SLAs, maybe also 1/encounter and not X/day...

Yes, but because you're going to improve 3.5, why don't get rid of dead levels? We've already discussed this in another section, and i keep on thinking that adding class features would not be a problem, both in GM's and players' point of view.

I would not consider BAB and saves as a goodie... Every class gets them, though at different ratios, so they're not the shtick of a specified class. Just my opinion, i'd give something, even insignificant, at every level...

My critique is the same... I hate dead levels, and i think every class should get a goodie at every level...

Thank you very much Starwed! Obviously it would be Open Gaming Content.

Black Company by Green Ronin has the world dominated by god-like mages.

But it's more consistent if every class gets something at every level... And, if you are the player, it's in your interest to keep track of your goodies. If you're the master, NPCs don't have to be perfectly in line with all the rules (you can simply remember major details/abilities).

One brief comment, having skimmed briefly only through classes. I noticed some of them have dead levels. Wouldn't it be better if every class had at least one (even minimal) goodie at every level?

Freeport City of Adventures (Green Ronin) True 20 (Green Ronin) Monte Cook's Arcana Evolved (Malhavoc Press) Grim Tales (Bad Axe Games) Nephandum (Asterios Press, the italian version) Midnight 2nd Edition (Fantasy Flight Games) A Game of Thrones (Guardians of Order) Pathfinder Beta (Paizo)

I think it's simply another way of thinking. By keeping SR as you made it, you still think it as a barrier against every magical "attack". By transforming SR in a mere bonus against defenses (maybe making it higher than yours), SR becomes a reinforcement of existing barriers: if the spell in...

Why don't make SR a bonus to all the defenses (AC, saves) against magic effects, and nothing more? That way you boost it against spells that have a SR entry, but you don't add the necessity of one more roll (if a spell doesn't have SR, it still won't have).