Search results

Time heals all wounds. :]

Just another question... anyone using EoM with the rules for magic items from the Artificer's Handbook (from Mystic Eye Games)? DonM.

Yeah, I don't want to delay this coming out - I want it now! But, I want us to be ready to give GMs some help...

Perhaps you misunderstand my intent... I think that every GM that looks over tEoM will love it, until they realize how much work it really requires for full implementation... And I'm suggesting that we should take care of that little problem; sure - some of the "conversions" are obvious - and...

teom "srd replacements" It strikes me that what would be very useful (and admittedly, difficult for the authors) would be for someone(s) to detail the required supporting changes to the existing SRD spells, magic items and monsters... Or, is some of that already in the revision? As is, tEoM...

Agreement with those who believe that having the Holy Warrior able to reproduce the 3.5 paladin is a good thing. I do have to ask, if one option for the mount fixes it back to the 3.0 version, I'm in favor of that. DonM.

I don't believe that EoM (at least in its current form) is very easy for a group to just "drop in", all other campaign elements remaining *by the book*. I'm proposing such an appendix/web enhancement: something that does all the work for the PHB classes and spells (a lot of which is there). All...

The sad thing is, I really wanted to get across the other part of my posting: Sigh...

I'm not sure about the revision; seems like fewer spell lists actually means LESS able to duplicate existing PHB effects. Please tell me I'm wrong? May I recommend that rather than (as the original edition did) rely on the DM for MUCHO work integrating this into the campaign, that an additional...

Who produces this? Sounds interesting...

What is special about them? I haven't seen Fading Suns d20.

What about the magic system in Elements of Magic? Could you compare the two?

I'm asking for suggestion for good, d20 OGL mechanics that were so good that they should be considered for use in any campaign or setting. My first two examples: 1. Ritual Magic, from Rituals and Relics. 2. Feat Templates, from Joe's Book of Enchantment. Other suggestions?

I'm working on a "non-spellslot, non-spell point" casting system for my campaign... If' this has worked right, I've attached a word doc with my current idea. And if you don't think that spellcasters should be able to cast like fighters swing their swords, don't post stuff like "d00d, ur idea...

There's also this site: http://www.steigerwaldedv.com/vintyri/licsdocs.htm DonM.

ProgressQuest.... Ahh. Those were the days. We were like Gods that walked the Earth. Everquest, Ultima Online, NWN - they all paled in comparison. :)

I'm responding to you personally, but if I test anyone's stuff, I agree to an effective "NDA" with each entry (including between entries) and I don't think I should judge, as I may develop biases between who comes to me for testing and what not. I'd like to judge, but I think at this point I'm...

I've got a number of browsers and systems here, and some odd pdf readers. I'd love to volunteer to assist in "looking" at SRDs to help insure usability. DonM.

I'm glad to see the Planes and Epic stuff appear in 3.5 (and even happier to see it in the SRD). However, given the nature of the revision, what do YOU think should have been added: Limits to this discussion (please?): 1. It must be in WotC published product only. 2. It should either really be...

Oops! Because I don't let my PCs be evil :) I'll change that to "ANY". Thanks!