Search results

After reading one of JC's tweets concerning bonus action in a multiple attack sequence, I've come to the conclusion that shield master comes after the attacks and can't trigger between. Two weapon fighting can, however, since it states "and attack". Here is the tweet I am referring to...

One could argue that, "You choose when to take a bonus action during your turn, unless the bonus action's timing is specified, and anything that deprives you of your ability to take actions also prevents you from taking a bonus action." is also an exception to this rule, just like movement is.

One could argue that, "You choose when to take a bonus action during your turn, unless the bonus action's timing is specified, and anything that deprives you of your ability to take actions also prevents you from taking a bonus action." is also an exception to this rule, just like movement is.

It's the vague wording of shield master vs the specific wording of two other examples of bonus action if/then statements I don't like. Bonus action: You choose when to take a bonus action during your turn, unless the bonus action's timing is specified, and anything that deprives you of your...

It's the vague wording of shield master vs the specific wording of two other examples of bonus action if/then statements I don't like. Bonus action: You choose when to take a bonus action during your turn, unless the bonus action's timing is specified, and anything that deprives you of your...

What is funny is most games don't go over level 10, so really, it's an argument that in the real world doesn't mean much at all. Even if you allow attack, slam, attack they get one attack with advantage. Vs a greater invisibility rogue lol.

What is funny is most games don't go over level 10, so really, it's an argument that in the real world doesn't mean much at all. Even if you allow attack, slam, attack they get one attack with advantage. Vs a greater invisibility rogue lol.

The part about if you dress up cracked me up! I could see you saying, " What do I look like, a LARPer! " Haha. That's just a joke btw, if you do LARP. LARP on and have fun!

I stopped playing in the 80’s. It was time for college and then life took me on different roads. But one day, after being established in my career and looking to jumping into a hobby again, I decided to check out my old TTRPG D&D to see how it faired. More out of nostalgia than anything. I found...

I mean clarify further. As in further elaboration would be nice as to Indivisible actions. The Shield Master feat lets you shove someone as a bonus action if you take the Attack action. Can you take that bonus action before the Attack action? No. The bonus action provided by the Shield Master...

I mean clarify further. As in further elaboration would be nice as to Indivisible actions. The Shield Master feat lets you shove someone as a bonus action if you take the Attack action. Can you take that bonus action before the Attack action? No. The bonus action provided by the Shield Master...

Sounds like you got the idea! Keep on representing my friend.

Yeah just remember that survive, doesn't necessarily mean kill everything, it means using all available resources to live another day. By any means neccessary. And you guys have plenty of tools to get out of that situation alive. Now the npc on the other hand........😀😛

The beast master is a good example as something most people see as weak but can work. I've seen players send the beast in every round like a tank fighter and lose it immediately. But I've also seen players use it to assist people, protect the back row with grappling (large constrictor snake)...

Arcane trickster creates the illusion of a deer standing in the midst of the yeti then runs. The cavalier hops on his shield and slides down the snowy hill as fast as he can, while the brute hangs onto the Cavaliers belt and gets dragged behind him. Tell no one in town what happened, pretend to...

I think that is splitting hairs. At least for me, it's pretty clear that you can make an attack with your offhand weapon when you attack with your main hand weapon. It's also clear that there is no wording that states that all main hand weapon attacks must be finished first. Since its...

I think that is splitting hairs. At least for me, it's pretty clear that you can make an attack with your offhand weapon when you attack with your main hand weapon. It's also clear that there is no wording that states that all main hand weapon attacks must be finished first. Since its...

PHB on Two Weapon Fighting "Two-Weapon Fighting When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand." This reads that IF you take...

PHB on Two Weapon Fighting "Two-Weapon Fighting When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand." This reads that IF you take...

And BTW I am not saying if you disagree with me you're wrong and I'm right, I am mainly saying that I can see coming to either conclusion could be valid at this point. I'm just more in favor of my interpretation and mean no offense to anyone who sees it differently than I.