Search results

It does, thank you!

I'm really looking forward to it. But I'm a little confused. When it comes out tomorrow (Friday) is that a just a phyical pre-order with the PDF releasing right away or is it ready to ship tomorrow?

I finished running Shadows of Yog-Sothoth maybe a year or so ago and heavily customized would be the way to go. The connective tissue between the adventures is pretty tenuous and thin and can be easily missed. As classic CoC campaigns go I would rate Shadows pretty much behind all the others.

If you're looking for 40K inquisitorial campaigns there's been a few published for Dark Heresy 1 and 2E. You might want to give them a look.

Speaking of trying new things. I've been talking about how to run a game I like on here. Is this what it's supposed to be like?

Yeah, a book like the Grand Grimoire of Cthulhu Mythos Magic, but for mythos tomes would be amazing.

Since it was written by a TV writer, absolutely.

I'll second the deluxe prop set. If you're going to invest the two years required to play the campaign spending the money for the prop set is definitely worth it. I still haven't really looked into running the new edition of Masks with the Companion. I wonder how that would work out since alot...

I don't normally play using Pulp rules, but yeah, Masks really benefits from it. Not just in terms of enhanced player survivability but the sort of Indiana Jones vibe the campaign can emit in times really works well with the Pulp rules. I rarely use all of them. You don't even need the real Pulp...

We don't kink shame here! (Unless your kink is MCDM).

You know, different trip, and it was in the bay area. But, I was on the 101 North near San Jose and I went 9 miles in THREE hours. I swore to never complain about Chicago traffic ever again.

Fair, I should specified standing medieval style armies. Ranks of pikemen and all that. Not Dragon RAF vs Drake Luftwaffe.

You know, funny story about LA. I happened to be in town for a day and one of my buddies had moved there. I called him up and was like "Hey, let's hang out". We happened to be about 12 miles apart as the crow flies or something like that. And he declined. Turns out, in LA traffic at that time it...

Right. I think the bigger issue is that even if it's not a spell that's denoted mechanically in a book, people assume the spaces in between must exist. Right, like, if high level clerical magic can literally reverse PC death, then one could assume that they can cure paraplegia as an example...

Oh, it's not controversial, at least to me, I just find it worth pointing out as sort of a weird diegetic inconsistency. I mean Picard is a bald French man from Yorkshire and we all love him. Lots of stuff fits in that bucket in D&D. I didn't read the middle, say, 100 pages of this thread, are...

Delta Green game, playing "Last Things, Last": Set septic tank lady ablaze.

Man, I'm glad it's working out for some of you. But the lesson I learned in varying hobby spaces is this: You'll be happier if you don't turn your hobby into a business.

This is like Picard being bald in the 24th century. This wizard can't cast cure astigmatism.

I take it you haven't seen their OGL statement in their books? They let down the side there. TLDR; we get to use previously created Open Game Content, but our mechanics? Naw, that's all product identity. They're not alone in this. Goodman, Monte Cook do it too. Becoming less relevant as they...