Search results

Path of the Totem Warrior 48 College of Lore 41 Tempest Domain 22 Circle of the Shepherd 29 Battle Master 44 Way of the Kensei 37 Oath of the Ancients 46-2=44 Divine Soul 3 Gloom Stalker 46 Thief 48 Pact of the Fiend 32 School of Abjuration 32+1=33

I do wish the dwemer and all of their things would just GO AWAY, for all of their vaunted "no longer existing" :p

Barbarian: Path of the Totem Warrior 49 Bard: College of Lore 46 Cleric: Tempest Domain 26 Druid: Circle of the Shepherd 31 Fighter: Battle Master 45 Monk: Way of the Kensei 40 Paladin: Oath of the Ancients 50-2=48 Sorcerer: Divine Soul 14 Ranger: Gloom Stalker 48 Rogue: Thief 49 Warlock: Pact...

I don't know about dying, but I could quite easily see Hasbro/WotC putting the wrong people in charge of design decisions regarding the next edition and alienating vast numbers of fans. I remain skeptical that enough of them learned the right lessons from 4e as is.

The Abjuration Wizard isn't my personal favorite Wizard subclass; but it's still a Wizard (the bestest class ;)) and there are some interesting tricks one can pull off with it. I know a number of people who swear by it. Preventing damage to another PC feels pretty awesome to me personally. (When...

Sooo....one takes the Mobile feat instead of Spell Sniper. And mostly accomplishes the same thing.

Barbarian: Path of the Totem Warrior 48 Bard: College of Lore 48 Cleric: Tempest Domain 31 Druid: Circle of the Shepherd 36 Fighter: Battle Master 48 Monk: Way of the Kensei 41 Paladin: Oath of the Ancients 49-2=47 Sorcerer: Divine Soul 26 Ranger: Gloom Stalker 49 Rogue: Thief 52 Warlock: Pact...

I think it's fun to play stupid characters sometimes. At least as long as one doesn't let it become a detriment to the rest of the party. (e.g. one brings some tangible benefit to the party and lets the other PCs "manage" you). I'm particularly fond of playing stupid spellcasters. Kender on...

Nothing wrong with a mystery box, as long as 1) there actually ARE answers, and 2) the DM/author/screenwriter doesn't keep gratuitously smacking the audience (e.g. PCs) upside the head with it. Sadly those conditions are too much to ask for some.

Broad. At both class and subclass level. But then give them customization options.

Barbarian: Path of the Totem Warrior 52 Bard: College of Lore 50 Cleric: Tempest Domain 38 Druid: Circle of the Shepherd 40 Fighter: Battle Master 43 Monk: Way of the Kensei 48 Paladin: Oath of the Ancients 52-2=50 Sorcerer: Divine Soul 40 Ranger: Gloom Stalker 50 Rogue: Thief 53 Warlock: Pact...

Artificer: Battle Smith 17 Barbarian: Path of the Totem Warrior 50 Bard: College of Lore 50 Cleric: Tempest Domain 43 Druid: Circle of the Shepherd 44 Fighter: Battle Master 45 Monk: Way of the Kensei 49 Paladin: Oath of the Ancients 53-2=51 Sorcerer: Divine Soul 44 Ranger: Gloom Stalker 49...

Artificer: Battle Smith 30 Barbarian: Path of the Totem Warrior 48 Bard: College of Lore 53 Cleric: Tempest Domain 46 Druid: Circle of the Shepherd 45 Fighter: Battle Master 44 Monk: Way of the Kensei 54 Paladin: Oath of the Ancients 53-2=51 Sorcerer: Divine Soul 48 Ranger: Gloom Stalker 52...

What foes you face are kinda campaign / setting/ DM dependent. So your experience isn't necessarily invalid. Have been enemy listings released since last I counted anyway, so I might not even still be correct.

Nature of the beast, I'd guess. If you want something like that you might do better with a simple, single-time vote class poll.

Poison damage is the most common energy type, barring large numbers of NPC mages. Or at least most common per enemy type.

Kender are a blight upon the world of gaming. The most noxious and heinous character idea ever created - in part because they're just short of being so actively obscene or cringe as to be self-censoring. Oh wait, you meant this incarnation of the kender? Sorry, haven't had a chance to notice...

Little curious as to why you think this? The 5e cleric has more unique abilities than almost any other previous edition afaict (prolly not more than 4e because of how 4e was structured). Not that that guarantees non-boringness or anything, but...

Sounds to me like a lot of people are downvoting classes because they're butthurt that their particular favorite subclass didn't win in that category. Which I guess is pretty typical.

More on point, I don't use any consistent method in any of my game worlds. Some are born from cosmic forces, some arise from worship, some ascend to godhood from a variety of immortal or mortal races. Some are born to other gods. Sometimes particular events just cause them to form. Sometimes...