Search results

You're making a big assumption that ProfC is levying a complaint about responses to his own posts, when he didn't actually say that. I personally share the exact same aggravation every day, just from reading other threads that I've never even posted in.

Are you also a WOTC staffer or... something? It's really hard to follow the implied context of this thread.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_online#Version_2.0

At any rate, I heartily encourage Morris to continue posting his professional observations, exactly like he's done in the past, regardless of what anyone who may or may not work at WOTC thinks about it.

Now, why would you think that indicates anything to those of us who have never visited WOTC forums? If I'm not mistaken, I think you'll find it customary here at ENWorld for WOTC employees to put their name and position in their signature line. I really don't want to be snide, but ENWorld...

Since this was in a reply to me, I'll challenge you to show any post from me where I was "complaining". I was solely an observer of this thread until you criticized Morris' methodology. Look, clearly you've had a nerve touched because (from what you say) you work at WOTC. But this site is...

As a 3E gamer, that entirely depends on whether Goodman can sell 3E-compatible products. And hmmm.... it just so happens to be a particular license that determines whether he can or not.

Completely and totally disagree. I'd hate to see Morris' honest observations shut down by anybody on here. If one couldn't say that WOTC forum performance "sucks" then frankly that person would not be speakingly honestly.

I disagree with this. Morris' posts seemed perfectly civil, businesslike, and honest to me. His professional insights are the best information some of us can get to weigh the status of the Wizards forums and digital presence at the moment. Huge thanks to him for posting them publicly.

Wow, fascinating research with that link, Psion. (I'm particularly fond of LostSoul's post on p. 2.)

Me, I'm only interested in the P&P game. I'm sure the trademark will be applied to all sorts of other products in the future.

My prediction is that P&P D&D will stop being published around 2018.

See, that's the kind of thinking that gets people in complicated relationship trouble. Drain-type people don't act rationally like you or I do. Also as a college teacher, I see that 5-10% of people are agents of chaos who try to drag as much time and energy out of you as possible for no good...

He's communicating very clearly what he wants -- it sounds like it's the opposite of what you want. Don't think that you're going to persuade him or somehow trick him into the game you want. Politely go your separate ways -- anything else will be a big waste of time and energy. P.S. Okay...

Actually no in theory -- it was an early plan that was never actually executed by Wizards.

If you have a strong opinion about what Goodman Games is doing for its 4E licensing, be sure to register it in the poll here: http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=232730

Agree with the OP. It's interesting to observe that seemingly lots of successful games start out with very tight knitting between mood & mechanics, and then over time seem to evolve in a way that disconnects them, until the mechanics become ends-unto-themselves. I was in a hobby store a few...

What on earth are you talking about? I'm replying directly to the question you raised in the OP. Do you not remember the subject on which you started this thread?

I don't know which ones would be useful for a given future campaign. And I'm not buying all of them. So this sucks.

That's too bad. I was hoping to have those available in the future.