Search results

To be clear, I have no say over anything in the VRC, and know nothing more about it than is already public knowledge. However, I do love brainstorming, and I’m looking forward to seeing how our favorite classes might be reimagined in a sci-fi setting.

@Steampunkette So pumped to have your work in my hands (metaphorically at least. I backed the PDF) today! Question: how do you see the Esper fitting into the a5e ecosystem once the VRC Psion is released?

I had a couple of thoughts on that point. My two biggest ideas are a garment-centric artificer and a cook. The idea of a dungeon architect was also floated.

The Necromancer, posted on the website, at present. But I reserve the right to update the definition :)

The Savants now have GPG archetypes (which is extra exciting to me, because I wrote them)! Now we just gotta get some Artificers in there…

Me, at seeing my name :)

SWEET! Also, I hope that the Artificer gets a few spells thrown their way when new spells are added to the game in the future. I felt like a lot of the non-adventurer spells in GPG #10 would have made good additions. :)

Recall that you get Battle Hymn Focus at 4th Level, and Battle Hymn Specialization at 8th. That can change the calculus.

I noticed that many of the creatures from Mythological Figures and Maleficent Monsters were added to A5e.tools some time recently (whereas before I think Achilles was the only one on the site), solving my dilemma as to which ones should get the Unique and NPC tags on my spreadsheet. (The answer...

It’s expected this Spring, which I last heard Morrus confirm on a recent livestream. They’re going to make sure the GPG Annual is wrapped up first though.

My hunch is that this is going to end up being like the Adept and Berserker having a weird maneuver progression, to which I never received a satisfactory answer, mostly because I don’t think there is one. I like your fix though! :)

So far, the only addition since its initial release has been the Artificer and Savant classes.

I mean that A5eSRD is more than twice as long than the original SRD and includes things like feats and archetypes!

Yes, but with more stuff!

WOOT WOOT!!!

MM pg 7: “For magical effects and spells that rely on a creature’s Challenge Rating, such as true polymorph, treat an elite monster as if its Challenge Rating was doubled.” But yes, I agree with the HP problem

They don’t. Which is the whole point, of course. They just suddenly realized they need to make something that looks palatable enough from the outside for the player base to let them get away with it. Unfortunately for them, no one trusts them enough to even sign a receipt from them without...

I’m happy to move to something other that the OGL if WotC is just going to keep trying to make moves like this, but I also want to teach them a bit of a lesson about what you can and cannot get away with as a corporation. And I want anyone who doesn’t care about D&D but who is watching Hasbro rn...