Search results

Interested in this topic.

Is this meme still alive?

Mechanics and lore, seeing what they did with the new FR books of removing anything from 4e because "most people got upset because of it" (this was the actual reason, as stated by the Tondro guy in Discord).

Gloomwrought is not a Shadovar city, tho. Some of them live there, but they didn't founded it. It's a city founded by people from other world of the multiverse.

I miss Tymanther...

He is a platinum dragon boy, She was a five-headed dragon girl, Can I make it any more obvious? 😜

And 5 Doritos later, they released Exandria, that made her the default goddess of death, with a lore more faithful to her original... So, like, I don't think making her a planar being was necessary at all. If that was even the reason for the change (that I really doubt)

The only problem with Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes is that it unnecessarily ruined the Raven Queen...

My thing with humans is that I find playing them boring (as opposed to saying that they are boring). I'm already a human in my real life. Why would I want to play as one in my escapism? If I get to play a pointy eared human or a blue-skinned human over the just plain normal human, I will.

I think people has said this many times enough, but Session Zero is key. That and a mini document explaining the setting you want to play. It can be a single page document explaining the limitations and feeling of the setting. In my experience, I know a lot of old guard GMs that complain about...

After this book destroyed my 14 year old campaign, I'm also looking for a new setting to play. Has Tales ever converted the dragonborn (dragonkin, I think they called them in Midgard) to their system? I think that if we are going to have a Dragon Sultana, I prefer the original over the cheap...

The price is indeed a bit high for me (taking into account that I have to convert my money into dollars first), but is definitely more accessible than the official books.

I'm also interested to know what is the issue with the dates.

That quote is from the new book...

If the fake stories are irrelevant, then why do you get the new books? The old books also have fluff and NPCs and that.

Going to give you an example with the place that affects my campaign specifically. Hard facts: Tymanther is no more Djerad Thymar still stands (and for some reason that it has art district is relevant) Messemprar is the only city independent from Gilgeam. Things that remain vague and that...

The thing is that these books barely give you a few hard facts, and there is no mystery either. So, you have nothing to work with but vague details. And if I have to determine which stuff is, then, again, I'll prefer to do homebrew. So, 60 bucks for scarce details and a few NPCs seems like a lot.

More than obsessing with lore is that I find hard to believe someone is willing to pay 60 dollars for a couple of adventures they can improvise for free at home. The idea of playing in a pre-made setting, at least for me, is that you were buying that fictional narrative. If I have to make the...

But I was here for the fake stories too, not only the adventures. I think they are losing a part of the customers base by doing that. They don't have to, though. A lot of people is already doing that for free, and updating the Wiki. They can read the Wiki and get their conclusions from it...

Yarin existed since 4e. He is mentioned in the FRCG entry of Damara. I know you want the novels to be part of the "main canon" (to give it a name), but the thing is that they are not. We have to accept that and move on. And I get you. I still get mad every time I look to my campaign guide to...