Search results

I'm not linking it a third time. If you can't see it the first two times, I'm not wasting my time on a third.

Yes. What about them? Just like I said, people liked them and others disliked them. I'm really not sure why they haven't been put into 5e or 5.5e yet.

It says PCs get the same traits as the rest of the race, not that they get different traits. NPCs and PCs are both part of the same race, so they all get the same traits. While NPCs and PCs don't follow the same set-up for creation, they still follow the same rules for racial abilities. An...

:rolleyes: Posted it twice. Go back and re-read some.

Provide me a citation saying "ECMO3 is right" and I will concede. :rolleyes: What I provided was sufficient. I'm not going to play your silly game of finding the exact wording you choose to put down or else you're right.

This is what I mean by you just reading to argue and not understand. And I quote..........................again! "you show signs of wear, such as cuts and bruises." Do you understand what "such as" means? And I quote.......................again! "An attack that reduces you to 0 hit points...

The mind flayer would cause no physical damage. The dragon will not even hit the PC until half hit points or lower, and won't directly strike until 0. Same with guiding bolt. It misses until half hit points, doing luck/skill/etc. damage, then causes minor things until 0. I quoted it. Don't...

An army of high elves with firebolt and other offensive cantrip would probably destroy them.

It's not 5e, either. Or 4e that I've heard. Or 3e. Or 3.5e. No edition of D&D has done that to them.

Riiiiiiight, you're bloodied(cut), but not bloodied. :rolleyes: Give me a break. Do you have a real counterargument? I quoted how and said how. But since you're reading to argue and not to understand, you of course "missed" it.

Not according to everything I've heard. Do you have any specifics to give?

Nothing there contradicts me dude. Trying reading to understand and not just to argue. As for the bloodied condition, did you not see the part in 5e where you show cuts and bruises at half hit points. That's blooded. 🤦‍♂️ PS You just disproved your own argument there. If you aren't...

Yep. It's Mel's Diner, which I've eaten at in Hollywood. The food was good, but overpriced for the quality. I haven't been back.

The rule is clear. The hit that drops you to 0 is the one that does the real damage. Until then you are completely unscathed or suffer minor bruises/scratches. There are exception, but those are for things like poison stingers which do have to do minor damage to you before you would normally...

Yes it will, because if they have hit points left, it does not strike the heart or even the body if they have enough hit points. The person rolls over in their sleep and the attack "misses" for the amount of damage the attack does, or some other luck, skill, divine intervention hp damage...

Not having a breath weapon is not backed up by 5.5e anywhere. Having one IS backed up by the 5.5e PHB which states that the traits a PC gets is from the race. They are not something special for the PC only.

No rule replaced that rule. A statblock is not a rule. Things in the stat block are rules and no rule replaces the one from 5e. There is no new version of the rule that races get their abilities The 5e rule from PHB Page 177 is... "The peoples of the D&D multiverse hail from different...

What rule says the 5e rules for races don't apply? Simply making a new stat block for 5.5e doesn't contradict the 5e rules that if I make an elf bandit, it gets elf abilities, unlike a human bandit. Only specifically new rules change the old ones.

You aren't understanding. We are human. We can ONLY think as a human does. We can pretend that we know how a dragon man would think and act, but we can only do so as a human thinks, not as a dragon man thinks. Therefore, all such pretenses are essentially playing dragon men, elves, cat...

I'll take Garfield and Jon for $500.