Search results

The multiple lines TSR created did not cause its demise -- they were a symptom of what was actually killing the company (Williams' playing financial games with the distributor). TSR needed stuff to ship in order to abuse that relationship for financial gain, so TSR designers creates a bunch of...

I don't work for WotC. I do not care about their profit margin. That said, if WotC is to be believed, there has been a massive increase in the player base over the last 10 years, and yet we are still only given the same 5 or so books per year. Surely they have room to experiment and target...

Kind of an aside, but: whatever came of the time travel shenanigans in the previous trilogy?

Thanks for the attempt but the "promotion is no longer available." I am sure some brave soul over at YouTube has a lore video on the Citadel, tho.

What does "classic DragonLance" mean? or, rather, what is NOT "classic DragonLance"?

See, now I feel like I need to know more.

I don't mean to dismiss Radiant Citadel (especially as i don't own it) but when I say "setting" I personally mean a big book like the FRCS or Rising from the Last War or similar.

Isn't Radiant Citadel an adventure anthology?

Gawds I hated Taladas... I don't know how differently i can say it: as a lifelong fan of D&D, I LIKE it when there is something official from D&D that gets me excited. That is the whole motivation.

That is what The Hunt For Golem is.

Yeah, flashback city.

I don't care for campaign length adventures or splatbooks, so there isn't much else WotC could put out besides a setting that WOULD excite me. I suppose a really cool focused monster book like Fizban's (maybe for the fae, or perhaps demons and devils) might get me going. But remember this thread...

It is fine if you don't pay for them. ;)

I linked the definition -- and you quoted that post where I linked it. "Had no idea" feels a little bit disingenuous since we know you at least acknowledged the definition, but chose to ignore it in order to continue an argument only you were having. Even after I defined it for you multiple...

Right. Someone asked what I thought was missing, that's all.

That seems extra silly considering those actors are 25 odd years older than when those movies were filmed. Just do it as a sequel. I will never understand the need to constantly return to the same well over and over. but we have talked about this with regards to D&D settings, so...

What can I say? You are being obtuse.

15 for me. Man, 35 was a GREAT age.

If you reject the terminology, there really is not anything to talk about, is there?

I don't think that matters. After all, they are making Dark Sun and Swords and Sandals peaked more like 70 years ago.