Search results

Assuming sneak attack will be as dominant a Rogue/Thief feature as in previous editions, bringing back sneak attack immunity would be an awful idea, imo. I really don't understand what an immunity would bring to the table, that justifies having a useless rogue hanging around. If this is...

You fail, because OP's points fail.

It's alot of small things, minions included. In 4E i feel that my character, is much less character, and alot more combat machine. I liked being able to pick skills(sometimes wierd skills) that supported my character concept. I don't like the way that ability scores work with classes now. As a...

Basicly, your pointing out differences in a PnP game and a MMORPG. I think you are the one "smoking concrete" if you can't see that 4E is a big step towards WoW. If thats a good thing or a bad thing, I am not to judge. OOT: Considering the WoW content, it is a very balanced MMO. 4E will never...

The whole math and mechanics in 4E, makes the game feel like a facade(to me, that is). 3.5 feels like a world to me.

Yeah, I was pretty excited about this one to, but to be honest, its not really a great idea. Races would easily be to specialized and making alot of different, but generally usefull racial progression,(also considering all the races that are coming later) would be something that could never...

I totally agree. I've been so excited about 4E since it was announced, and I've followed the development on daily basis and been very supportive about the changes that the designers wanted to do, but now, after learning how it turned out, I cant help to feel really disappointed. To me, 3.5 feels...

Mechanicly, its correct, theres not much of a difference. The whole difference lies in the fluff, wich is non-existant in the mechanical monster that is 4th ed.

Well, for starters the skill bonus and a couple of feats. The more important, its a part of your character. And having a more charismatic character, should (IMO) also make for easier character interaction, also when your not "rollplaying". And that is the difference between 3.5 and 4th ed. In...

Swashbuckler, Duelist and Invisble blade, had great benefit of dexterity and intelligence. Only the Duelist is from a core book, in 3.5 that is.

I think that we have to realize that 4th ed. is a pure mechanics game. Funny thing is that it would take a stupid rogue, to actually have more than 8 INT :D . I really liked the fact that every stat in 3.5 was somehow useful. It gave it a more open ended feel and your stats on your sheets would...

I must admit that I´m a little dissapointed overall with the quality of the art(only speaking of Player´s Handbook though). In particular I think that Anne Stokes art is really bad(look at the eledrin race picture), which is a shame, considering she has some great pieces on her website. Maybe...