Search results

  1. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E WotC has updated the Hadozee glide ability on DnDBeyond

    I'm not entirely sure the post you're arguing against is actually in good faith.
  2. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E WotC has updated the Hadozee glide ability on DnDBeyond

    It's pretty good so far, yeah.
  3. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E WotC has updated the Hadozee glide ability on DnDBeyond

    Don't think that's even 'presumably' because it's the way it operates right now, that post is just dumb.
  4. a.everett1287

    D&D (2024) One D&D is one D&D too much (-)

    I don't think it had that far to travel.
  5. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E The Monetization of D&D and other Role Playing Games

    Really the only relevant portion.
  6. a.everett1287

    D&D (2024) First playtest thread! One D&D Character Origins.

    Haha, I don't know what would be brutal about that opinion, but I've seen your other posts on the board; if you're down on it I might like it :sneaky: :ROFLMAO:
  7. a.everett1287

    D&D (2024) First playtest thread! One D&D Character Origins.

    This means I should check it out, innit?
  8. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E The Monetization of D&D and other Role Playing Games

    Well, you know what they say. 'Listin' ain't easy but it's necessary.'
  9. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E The Monetization of D&D and other Role Playing Games

    What, exactly, would be an acceptable level of monetization for you? I'm not sold on this anecdotal idea that there's less DIY, and I'm definitely not sold on the idea that, since people want to get paid for their creative output, that somehow implies predatory practices.
  10. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E The Monetization of D&D and other Role Playing Games

    It is 100% just a feeling, and I really really doubt it's an accurate one.
  11. a.everett1287

    Spelljammer Space Clowns Are A Thing In Spelljammer

    This is still misunderstanding what fear is, and specifically phobias.
  12. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E D&D Beyond Previews Flying Pigs, Space Hamsters, And More!

    My fault. I'm really excited for this setting
  13. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E D&D Beyond Previews Flying Pigs, Space Hamsters, And More!

    I think we are in agreement then? I wasn't arguing that the setting can't be played straight, I'm arguing the opposite. I probably am not really stating my opinion correctly, in that case. I apologize for that
  14. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E D&D Beyond Previews Flying Pigs, Space Hamsters, And More!

    Right, but my point is that we don't really have the information to say this iteration can't be played as straightforward
  15. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E D&D Beyond Previews Flying Pigs, Space Hamsters, And More!

    .... How? How could you have played it any straighter that what we've currently seen allows? I don't get it.
  16. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E Toxicity in the Fandom

    100% correct. I meant to say 'not just a jerk.'
  17. a.everett1287

    D&D 5E Toxicity in the Fandom

    So, if your cause is inclusion and you're a jerk, then yeah, you're a jerk and should probably think about how to less abrasive (although, if you're arguing against someone who doesn't even see you as a person or care about including you in the hobby, go off). If your cause is arguing against...
  18. a.everett1287

    D&D General As of 1998, 4,007,685 people played AD&D in the US, as estimated by Ben Riggs.

    So then there's a distinct possibility that the 'assumptions' Ben Riggs made weren't actually that sketchy or terrible.
  19. a.everett1287

    D&D General As of 1998, 4,007,685 people played AD&D in the US, as estimated by Ben Riggs.

    It's almost like Ben Riggs isn't just someone pulling data out of nowhere, and uses actual established methodologies. Gee, who would have thought.
  20. a.everett1287

    D&D General As of 1998, 4,007,685 people played AD&D in the US, as estimated by Ben Riggs.

    But I thought it was such a terrible assumption...
Top