Search results

Thanks, man.

Good thought. I worry more about the insubstantial thing, although half damage seems to scale on it's own. ???

So about a month ago, 4.0 published an article about how to hack monsters. http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080418a The same day, they published a cool new monster called the Phane. http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080418b It's right up my alley: it's creepy and...

Do you need a broom with that? I, the janitor of doom, will SWEEP YOUR LEGS! Mwa ha ha ha ha. If you want more Western style names, just gank them from the WWF.

I'm going to start my next game in Port Mantow

I like that one. It has some rigor. As far as I can tell, DND is no longer DND if you don't like the fluff. Which I've never quite gotten... because I always, always, always make my own fluff.

But they're a classic! Instead of being nerfed, I think they're being upgraded. Anything that has class levels is generally more versatile and interesting than anything without. I always like new races, especially high concept ones. It looks like fey are being elevated to a near outsider...

I think the real problem here is that the OP allowed his imagination to be railroaded. I find that with mythological creatures, people can be curiously literal. With all the vampire stories around, I keep having this conversation with my wife: "I thought vampires couldn't do (such and such)."...

Just warlocks, really.

I've been relying on that alot lately. Mostly, it makes me grit my teeth. Not precise enough. It's a form of congenital stupidity that I have.

I've used non-core classes that are definitely experiments: the warlock has been a consistently unbalancing force in my game, and I've been using the classes from Tome of Magic for villains. I have yet to find an instance in which a truenamer does not suck, but binders are hell fun and...

Were they fighting with steak knives?

One of my players is using leadership. After thinking about it awhile, I've come to the following conclusion. Leadership is unnecessary. RAW, it adds another strong arm to the group, letting them handle encounters more efficiently and gives them the same XP as if there were one fewer player in...

"One death sucks, but six spells T-P-K..." No, not ha ha funny. It was snort milk out your nose funny! Funniest DND comic EVar.

For lower levels, you could use creatures with the pseudonatural template from ?complete mage?

No thoughts about vivilors?

Hi! I hate summoning. I think the creatures you can summon rules as written are dull. Dull, dull, dull. Not to mention, the games I run tend to feature a lot of neutral character, so smite good and evil don't really enhance monsters much. I have fiddled extensively with the cosmology of my DND...

Extra plus one bonus I did something like this with an arrow: It did 1d6 extra flaming damage, transfering that to the person who shot it. I figured that it did plus 1d6 damage, and added +1d6 hit points, so it was an equivalent bonus. So it was a +3 weapon (+1 magic, +1 flaming, +1 1d6...

In my college game, I put a Sabertooth Tiger into a cold dungeon. When they ran across it, one of the players decided to talk to it. Feeling whimsical, he answered. He ended up haning with the group for a year's worth of gaming, but never did anything. I finally decided that he was a...

Ah, see there's my ditto. New class abilities are great, but the ones they offered seemed kinda pointless.