1000 ways to be a D&D Snob

[ColonelHardisson]

108. You are personally angered by stats for gods.

109. You sneer at 3e because there is a proliferation of magic items for characters to use - "back in the old days we ran entire campaigns with the PCs naked and weaponless. We even made them bind their arms to their sides so they couldn't punch!"

110. You sneer at players of older editions because there wasn't enough magic given out - "magic is an integral part of the game!"

 

[Scupper]

Corollary to 104 & 105:

You adamantly deny that every drow ranger PC is a Drizzt clone.

 

[ColonelHardisson]

91. You go through this thread thinking, "Oh god, this is me."

91a. Or you go through this thread and can think of valid reasons why each of these is okay in your game

You guys are so dead-on accurate it's scary...

 

[Dark Jezter]

111. You don't allow sorcerer PCs in your campaign because you consider them wizards for idiots.

112. You foamed at the mouth when you saw how beholders were used as mere guard dogs in the D&D movie.

113. You have ever penalized a PC for cracking a joke during a moment that was supposed to be dramatic.

114. You have ever said "You allowed a sixth-level PC to get a +2 weapon? What kind of munchy campaign are you running?"

 

[Scupper]

115. You have ever used the term "roll player" as a counterpoint to "roleplayer."

 

[Oogar]

116. you read posts like these thinking maybe you have something to add, and post even when you really don't.


Edit, fix Number

 

[Crothian]

You guys are so dead-on accurate it's scary...

117: You have well respected members of the message board compliment you and you think he's just trying to suck up to your greatness.

 

[Avatar]

118. You start threads discussing how characters in a movie could actually do what they did in D&D terms.

(No offense intended. Tongue firmly in cheek.)

 

[GravyFingerz]

113. You have ever penalized a PC for cracking a joke during a moment that was supposed to be dramatic.
[/B]

Good to know I'm not the only one

 

[EOL]

119- You've stated Star Wars, Star Trek, WoT or Highlander characters before someone published the stats and then you vehemently disagree with their statted interpretation of the character.