Paradoxish
First Post
In my current campaign I'm starting the PCs at level 2. One of my players has come up with a rough draft for his history. He wants to be a military commander from one of the small city-states in the western section of the region the campaign is set in. According to his background story he was one of the land's great leaders and heir to the throne, but went into self-imposed exile after a massive defeat that led to the deaths of many of his troops and may lead to his kingdom's downfall. His leaving was essentially an act of cowardice, he couldn't bear to bring the bad news to the King (his father) nor could he bear to see his homeland fall.
Anyway, does it makes sense that a 2nd level fighter could be a powerful military leader? Obviously the majority of soldiers in the army of level 1 warriors (or possibly just commoners), but there would have to be at least a few PC-levelled fighters/paladins/barbarians/whatever in the bunch, right? What do you guys think? Would it be too much of a stretch to allow this background or do you think it would make at least some logical sense?
Anyway, does it makes sense that a 2nd level fighter could be a powerful military leader? Obviously the majority of soldiers in the army of level 1 warriors (or possibly just commoners), but there would have to be at least a few PC-levelled fighters/paladins/barbarians/whatever in the bunch, right? What do you guys think? Would it be too much of a stretch to allow this background or do you think it would make at least some logical sense?