I like that animal companions progress with class level now. That's good. But I have an issue or two.
So I know there's some potential errata out there talking about the discrepancies in the books about animal companion type. Some places say it's a magical beast[augmented animal], other say it's an animal.
First, I feel that all of the companions abilities can be reached with non-magical means, except maybe share spells, which could be considered an ability of the Druid/Ranger. I'm not sure that making a companion a magical beast is a logical, or even desirable choice.
Pro: Enemies can't use spells that affect animals
Con: You can't use spells that affect animals!
So the ranger in my campaign can't cast Speak with Animals and talk to his wolf anymore? A druid can't Reduce or Animal Growth on his/her companion? If this is the case they should at least allow an empathic link similar to that granted to paladin mounts and familiars. It'd be nice to communicate with them every once in a while in ways beyond, "Come" and "Sic 'em, boy!"
So I know there's some potential errata out there talking about the discrepancies in the books about animal companion type. Some places say it's a magical beast[augmented animal], other say it's an animal.
First, I feel that all of the companions abilities can be reached with non-magical means, except maybe share spells, which could be considered an ability of the Druid/Ranger. I'm not sure that making a companion a magical beast is a logical, or even desirable choice.
Pro: Enemies can't use spells that affect animals
Con: You can't use spells that affect animals!
So the ranger in my campaign can't cast Speak with Animals and talk to his wolf anymore? A druid can't Reduce or Animal Growth on his/her companion? If this is the case they should at least allow an empathic link similar to that granted to paladin mounts and familiars. It'd be nice to communicate with them every once in a while in ways beyond, "Come" and "Sic 'em, boy!"