3.5 Revision you're most looking forward to?

What revision in the upcoming Core Books are you most looking forward to?

  • Bard revisions

    Votes: 11 8.5%
  • Monk revisions

    Votes: 3 2.3%
  • Druid revisions

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Ranger revisions

    Votes: 24 18.5%
  • Revisions of one of the other classes (Specify in post)

    Votes: 4 3.1%
  • New/updated art

    Votes: 6 4.6%
  • Revised monster stats (Pit Fiend, etc.)

    Votes: 8 6.2%
  • Having all the errata in one book

    Votes: 32 24.6%
  • Revised spells (Harm, Haste, etc.)

    Votes: 14 10.8%
  • Revised Combat

    Votes: 7 5.4%
  • Updated Item Creation Rules

    Votes: 10 7.7%
  • Other (Specify in post)

    Votes: 10 7.7%

Can't wait to incorporate the wizard and sorcerer changes. Gotta test out the haste though to see if the combat balance will be ok.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I like that DR is going away from (##/+x) to (##/Material or Weapon ability). It makes more sense and adds flavor, mmm 25/jalepeno.
 

I wish I could have picked more than one option on this poll!

I went with "Monk Revisions" since my character is a Monk, but I'd vote differently if I were looking at the big picture instead.

The promise to clarify things like Grapple I think is very nice; there are lots of corners of this game that dont get used as often as they should because its not that clear what you can do. (Can I run up behind you and pin your arms back so the Fighter can punch you? Grapple? Prone? +X? Hmmm.) Errata would be nice too. I know I spent many needless hours trying to figure out how much magic swords cost because of that typo in the DMG.
 

I can't choose just one!

As I've mentioned before, I need a new PHB & DMG as it is so I would have bought the new books just for the errata. But since they are fixing things I like the idea of the ranger getting a fix, the monk probably getting more diverse, the general combat and skill clarifications and for the MM, the easier-to-flip-thru stat blocks. The rest also sounds great, but those are on the top of my list for the moment. :)
 
Last edited:

Glad to see so much support for the Ranger gettin' his tweak. I didn't allow multiple choices because I felt too many people would check almost all of them. Life's full of tough choices; paper or plastic, blond or brunette, Ranger or errata. I'd say the single choice poll gave a pretty good "range" of where people's interests are. :cool:
 

I want to see how they fix/balance/whatnot the core classes. That, and I want my half-orc ranger/bard to stop being the laughing stock of the neighborhood. :(
 


I'd like to see some more interesting magic items. Particularly in the weapons/armor area. Not more powerful mind you, just more interesting. Again, in one book, I don't like having to reference multiple supplements. There are already three core books, who needs all the extras?
 

I voted for Bards. I like 'em, and I wish that they didn't suck under the core rules.

Monk revisions, spell adjustments, and the monster adjustments are what interests me after that, in no particular order.
 

I have always loved the ranger class but 3e version is a very watered down version of a fighter.

Beyond that, I hope they clarify the item creation costs. I am horrible at taking words and placing into a mathimatical equation. If they just gave an equation I could do it fine.
 

Remove ads

Top