[3.5] What class will have the least changes?

[krunchyfrogg]

I wonder what will be just about the same in 3.5.

Will Fighters, Clerics, Paladins and Rogues change much, if at all?

I'd like to play a character that doesn't have to go through a major transformation when 3.5 comes out.

 

[Merlion]

My guesses for least changed would probably be fighter, rogue and cleric. Also wizard and sorcerer in terms of class features although they will be changing somewhat because their spell list will be.

 

[warlocke]

What will change most will most likely be the fact that 3.5 will eliminate and subdue the power gamer. So that a guy who wants to take 1 level of ranger to get 3 feats will not be able to do that.
Same with the cleric and domains. It will destroy that "take one level of this class to benefit and exploit it" mentality.
Bravo and down with the power gaming munchkinism!

 

[Merlion]

An answer to the exact oposite question of what the original poster asked....

 

[Steverooo]

The Cleric.

We know Rogues will be getting "Trapfinding" (which probably allows them to auto-Search within X feet), and Fighters will have their choice of newly-added Feats... Clerics will have spells and levels revamped, though...

 

[warlocke]

Its interesting... why is it that you have such a problem with me? I am making a very valid point about the class changes in 3.5. You obviously have gotten your panties in a bunch and find this is the only way to express your hostility Merlion.

 

[Merlion]

Its interesting... why is it that you have such a problem with me? I am making a very valid point about the class changes in 3.5. You obviously have gotten your panties in a bunch and find this is the only way to express your hostility Merlion.

Well lets see in your post on the other thread you were outright insulting people(anyone who says X is a powergaming twit something along those lines) and taunting me for my number of posts. And on this thread you again rant about "powergaming" and "munchkinism".
Thease boards have rules and policies of civility. And although loser they also tend to frown on people being excessively negative to people based on play styles. What you consider "powergaming" might be deeply enjoyable for some. Just as people dont have a right to call us all satanists for playing DnD you have no right to deride someone for how they play.
And as for my response to your post on this thread well firstly I always find it strange when someone posts to a question thread with something unrelated or oposite to what was asked. and as I mentioned the negative attitude you express toward "munchkins" is very offputting.
Edit: and as far as we know nothing is changing about cleric domains.

 

[krunchyfrogg]

I find it interesting this troll only replies in threads I start.


It's all good. Don't let it bother you.

 

[Merlion]

I'm sorry about that krunchy.

Ohh and I LOVE your avatar

 

[Gumby]

But yeah, I'd say Fighters. At least technically, as while the feat list grows larger in the PH, they've already had access to all the Fighter feats in all the splatbooks that have come out.