I didn't vote.
I don't own the books. I followed the design journals and the previews and was disatisfied with a lot of the mechanical changes and some of the fundamental philosophy and inspriations of the design team- the thought of all which led me to walk out of a demo to free a spot in case someone else showed up to play.
<snip>
My conclusion was that I might try it after the third party companies get a hold of it and play with it just as was the case with 3e. Currently, however, there is nothing about 4e that makes me want to leave 3e. Third party support for 3e along with UA and a few house rules allows me to tailor 3e to be almost exactly what I wanted from a 4e- although I still want 4e's removal of the non-biological aspects of race (e.g., elven weapon bonuses and dwarven bonuses vs. giants) and its making them into feats.
Kudos on one of the most comprehensive polls I've seen in awhile!
We're currently alternating between a 4E campaign (run by me) and a 3.5 campaign (run by another player in the group). I'm running it VERY brusquely, with the PC gaining 1 level per session.
With this last weekend, the darndest thing happened: The group's largest 4E detractor (who's actually said it felt like a board game, that Wizards were ruined, that combat was stupid, etc.) actually CANCELLED going to the beach this weekend to play with us for our 4E game.
Therefore, our group concluded the End of the World was Nigh. We are looking for sackcloth-colored suns and Blood-red Moons any time now.![]()