That's only because Peter Jackson hasn't made a movie of them yet.Doug McCrae said:I don't see a resurgence of interest in REH, Leiber or Vance at the moment.
+6 WandsDoug McCrae said:The other huge fantasy success story right now is Harry Potter. So by your logic D&D should try to emulate that
Or, you know, "nothing of substance said there". If D&D were becoming more like Harry Potter, wands would be all-but-mandatory for wizards, not one magical tool among many.Irda Ranger said:+6 Wands
'nuff said there.
Doug McCrae said:Lord of the Rings is popular but other D&D fantasy isn't. I don't see a resurgence of interest in REH, Leiber or Vance at the moment.
.
Damn it. Now you spoiled it for me.DandD said:And Soylent Green is people!
Ranger REG said:This is a humor thread, right?![]()
Must be a coincidence then, since I think Gygax claimed (and yes, I know we should take that with a large grain of salt) that Tolkien was a much smaller influence on D&D when he created it than many other authors, some of whom have a very different feel from Tolkien. In a recent post in the thread where he answers questions on the General RPG Discussion board, he ranked the influences as follows:Hairfoot said:Well, OD&D played like the Tolkien books, 4E will play like the Tolkien movies. Sign of the times.
Y'know that's not a bad analogy at all, although I think that Tolkien 'feel' (not influence... his influence is obvious) was just about absent from every edition starting with AD&D.Hairfoot said:Well, OD&D played like the Tolkien books, 4E will play like the Tolkien movies. Sign of the times.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.