Ranger REG said:I personally believe that the fan community might be giving companies mixed signals. While I can only speak for myself, I never asked for 3.5e back in 2002. I never demanded any kind of revision for D&D Third Edition. Yet WotC must have heard demands for it from their fanbase.
I imagine what WotC actually heard was that were some real mechanical problems with 3.0, the splatbooks, and the PsiHB, but everyone seemed generally happy with 3.0 and the d20 and OGL licenses. Hasbro didn't think WotC was making enough money. And there were already standing plans to do 3.5 in 2004-2005. So someone got the idea to move the release of 3.5 up a year or two, and kill two birds with one stone.
Ranger REG said:Now, we're getting discussion threads about 4e. Mixed signals? Or is there a growing voice in our community that want yet another edition? They must be financially rich, farting $$$ out of their arse to want to spend $90 again. Is there dissatisfaction over the recent version to warrant such a demand?
Or they see parts of 3.5 that they dislike enough to warrant a revision, and if it means buying new books, it means buying new books. Now, I don't think that way myself; I think there's nowhere near enough wrong with 3.5 to do a 4.0 before 2008 or so, and that WotC should have released 3.5 on their original schedule, and the changes I'd like to make would involve mass slaughter of sacred cows, so most of them won't ever happen (and I keep buying OGL games hoping that one will hit my notion of the perfect d20 fantasy game). But if a new edition comes out, and it's definitely better IMO, then I'll end up buying it eventually.