tuxgeo
Adventurer
Yeah, here I am replying to myself again. . . .
Correcting my earlier mistake: OKAY, I got the name wrong: Mike Mearls called it "the gnome effect," not "the gnome problem." My error.
Here is a link to the appropriate post (by EN World user Iosue) in a previous thread, wherein Iosue quotes a "Legends & Lore" article which apparently can no longer be found on wizards.com.
. . . This means that 50% of the tables were affected, and would hear about the complaints of their one player who suddenly couldn't play a gnome even if wanting to right then.
Based on their experience with "The Gnome Problem," WotC declared that they thereby learned that 10% is effectively enough of the player base to indicate that a pre-existing feature of the game is wanted enough for WotC to need to include it in the game. That was in 2008-2009, and I don't have a link handy. Searching on the web might show evidence of that experience.
Correcting my earlier mistake: OKAY, I got the name wrong: Mike Mearls called it "the gnome effect," not "the gnome problem." My error.
Here is a link to the appropriate post (by EN World user Iosue) in a previous thread, wherein Iosue quotes a "Legends & Lore" article which apparently can no longer be found on wizards.com.
Last edited: