mellored
Legend
So it's about that specific lore wizard, not the idea of a lore wizard?It does what the Sorcerer is suppose to do but better + more spells + greater variety of spells + expertise on lore skills.
So it's about that specific lore wizard, not the idea of a lore wizard?It does what the Sorcerer is suppose to do but better + more spells + greater variety of spells + expertise on lore skills.
Pretty much, for me at least. It's not even that specific lore wizard per say, just the infringment on Sorcerer territory.So it's about that specific lore wizard, not the idea of a lore wizard?
I don't think any other class has ever generated so many threads at once so no wonder people have never complained about them. At one point there were so many that they ended up being cordoned off in their own subforum. If too many more show up, I could see it happening again. I actually found it quite handy, kept all the warlord threads together making it easier to keep up with them.As I said earlier there is nothing wrong about multiple threads on a class as multiple different topics exist within any class not taking purposeful derailment into account. Those who complained about multiple Warlord threads never complained about multiple threads about other classes hence I can honestly say that I have every reason to believe they have an agenda and that agenda appears to be to shutdown Warlord discussion. Guess what snowflakes it is not going to happen.
I could see it happening again. I actually found it quite handy, kept all the warlord threads together making it easier to keep up with them.
The reason for the flood though is, unlike virtually any other issue, we wind up having to spend at least half the time trying to justify just wanting something.
This thread as case in point. This isn't even discussing warlords as such. It's discussing whether or not it's even productive to bother starting the conversation.
You'd see a lot less threads if every thread didn't get derailed into a morass of people trying to tell other people they're wrong for wanting something.
As I said earlier there is nothing wrong about multiple threads on a class as multiple different topics exist within any class not taking purposeful derailment into account. Those who complained about multiple Warlord threads never complained about multiple threads about other classes hence I can honestly say that I have every reason to believe they have an agenda and that agenda appears to be to shutdown Warlord discussion. Guess what snowflakes it is not going to happen.
I haven't chosen to reply to this particular post out of any intention to single it out. It was just an easily-quoted, clear statement of the point.From a narrative approach, having martial classes do things that were more or less magical was a bit odd.
Recently Druid and Sorcerer. Wizards constantly get a flow of threads. At various stage mostly depending on what is being released there is a glut of focused discussion yet due to agendas Warlord is where it should not happen for some reason.What other class gets the magnitude of multiple threads in as short a period of time as the warlord does? I honestly haven't seen one.