FreeTheSlaves
Adventurer
Am I the only one to sit up and notice what with humans getting a blanket +1 to all scores, and another +1 to one of choice, and then presumably another +1 from class!
6-5 Rule of Three
- Thread starter nogray
- Start date
Incenjucar
Legend
It's been mentioned in threads here before.
Ahnehnois
First Post
I don't think it will surprise anyone that paladin is a class. Disappoint, maybe, but not surprise.
I like the advantage mechanic; but it does need to be hashed out what it means in-game vs. a flat number modifier and this statement didn't really help. "If you spend an action, you gain advantage" is a really metagame-y statement, and one that I doubt will hold true.
Races need penalties. Not everyone is average or better.
I like the advantage mechanic; but it does need to be hashed out what it means in-game vs. a flat number modifier and this statement didn't really help. "If you spend an action, you gain advantage" is a really metagame-y statement, and one that I doubt will hold true.
Races need penalties. Not everyone is average or better.
Falling Icicle
Adventurer
I do not like the superhuman ability score bonuses at all. Other races' bonuses aren't even an advantage in that case, they're just the one area in which they almost compete with ordinary humans... bleh. Just give humans a +1 to any single ability score they choose. That is powerful enough!
But what else should humans get? Well, a bonus feat like in 3.x and 4e is certainly appropriate, and from the look of how good feats are going to be in this edition, that would be a very nice bonus. Humans could also get an extra skill or something similar.
But what else should humans get? Well, a bonus feat like in 3.x and 4e is certainly appropriate, and from the look of how good feats are going to be in this edition, that would be a very nice bonus. Humans could also get an extra skill or something similar.
1) Paladins were obliviously a class
2) So am I right to infer that a rogue is intended to get sneak attack every other round at base as an action do gain advantage.
3) I don't like the "+1 everything plus one +1 to any for Humans". There has to be some non-stat racial feature for humans.
Humans:
+1 to one ability score of your choice
+2 trained skills
2) So am I right to infer that a rogue is intended to get sneak attack every other round at base as an action do gain advantage.
3) I don't like the "+1 everything plus one +1 to any for Humans". There has to be some non-stat racial feature for humans.
Humans:
+1 to one ability score of your choice
+2 trained skills
Last edited:
Gold Roger
First Post
Paladin is in-cool
PC's should put in effort to gain advantage- cool
Humans get +1 to everything, subraces are in, subraces determine ability score bonus, no ability malus- not cool at all, I get a massive case of the do-not-wants. If this stays, I hope there's a module completely rewriting how races are build.
PC's should put in effort to gain advantage- cool
Humans get +1 to everything, subraces are in, subraces determine ability score bonus, no ability malus- not cool at all, I get a massive case of the do-not-wants. If this stays, I hope there's a module completely rewriting how races are build.
Steely_Dan
First Post
I LOVE the bad reaction to the Human bonuses here and like every other forum.
Does anyone like it?
I do, a human getting a bonus to all scores sounds good to me (like angular banjos).
Do we know if these bonuses are +1 or +2?
Would a human gain +1 to all scores, and an additional +1 to one of his/her choice?
Does a high elf get +1 or +2 to Int?
Do classes also grant a bonus?
Steely_Dan
First Post
I would love the return of a bonus to all saving throws.
'cause i just that pretty.
'cause i just that pretty.
