Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad
Is it?
Because all through the playtest it was "D&D for everyone who ever loved D&D"
Ah, the lie trotted out again, and spun in a new and even more inventive way.
It's baloney Tony. That was never what they said, but more importantly (and don't cherry pick the first part of this sentence out of context please) IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ISSUE OF THE RULES PRESENTATION NEEDS TO BE STORY THEMED, they never ever even vaguely implied there was some conflicting interest with "D&D for everyone who ever loved D&D" in terms of that kind of rules PRESENTATION.
Yep. It could be.
But you cut the rest of my post which already responds to what you had to say after that period.
Let's do that again. What is your response to this?
"But given we don't have any data showing it's been harming the edition popularity, and it was the idea from the beginning to make it popular, and it is popular, it sure seems like continuing with that theme is wiser than not continuing with it. You would need some pretty good evidence showing it's both incidental to success and holding back success to make a major change in that theme at this point.
So what's the evidence showing it's incidental, and the evidence showing it has held back success, sufficient to overcome the burden of "it's working so don't mess with success" that is the 1000 ton locomotive driving this edition right now?"
Last edited: