• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

a game without alignments: my own experience

My group had the opposite reaction - with alighments everyon pretty much chose CG/CN/N when we use alignments. Now that we don't use them, they behave pretty closest to LG.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Celebrim said:
I have no particular love of the alignment system. I don't find it particularly elegant, and I don't think it does enough to encourage the players to role play.

The primary reason I've never abandoned it is that most peoples problems with the system seem to have more to do with thier own beliefs about morality, than any particular failure of the system to contribute to the game.

It always seems as if the most vocal opponents of the alignment system are those that want to play thier characters as Chaotic Evil (or at least Chaotic Greedy), but don't want the label 'evil' applied to thier actions for whatever reason. And generally, player who don't want an alignment system are hoping that it means - "There won't be any consequence to my actions."

It's always annoying to me, because I really don't believe that the alignment system adequetely reflects real problems of good and evil. But every time I make that claim, some player comes along and justifies that the system can indeed be applied to real people in meaningful ways. For instance, the alignment system invokes a enherently ordered universe of absolute moral principals. The alignment system therefore espouses the belief that the universe is an orderly place. Invariably, when some player comes along and says that he doesn't like the alignment system, it always turns out that the fundamental reason is that they don't believe that moral principals are orderly absolutes or that real people have any such beliefs. Which makes me want to pull my hair out.

So I don't ditch alignment because it would just be too much work for too little gain, given that the system by its very vagueness tends to be more broadly applicable than you would first think.
Celebrim; although I've heard that in theory, I've actually never seen it to be true -- people on these boards don't complain about the alignment system because they really want to be chaotic evil without being called that. People I've played with likewise don't do that.

The complaints I've seen the most about alignment are that it's really a poor descriptor of the character, it ends up being proscriptive rather than descriptive anyway, and it is used as an excuse for stupid and non-roleplaying type behavior. In other words, the system works poorly at what it is intended to do, and has even worse non-design-intent side effects. Or in yet other words, alignment is broken. ;)

If you have players that have the problem you describe, than alignment is neither the problem nor the solution to that -- you've just got lousy players. Solution: get some new ones.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top