machineelf
Explorer
First of all let me say that I love where D&D is going with 5th edition, and I love the hard work put in to the system. But can someone at WOTC do a little better job of proofreading the materials before they go out to press? I don't mean that to sound too harsh. I've noticed several misspellings or grammar problems in the books (one that is on the first entry of the Monster Manual. The first entry!)
But the latest is on the new DM screen. A "leutral" where there should be a "neutral." (An accidental combination of lawful and neutral no doubt.) There is so little actual text content on the DM screen that you'd think it would get a few good reads before going to the press. It's not the end of the world, just mildly annoying.
Am I being too harsh? I feel dirty because I love 5th ed. so much; maybe too much.
But the latest is on the new DM screen. A "leutral" where there should be a "neutral." (An accidental combination of lawful and neutral no doubt.) There is so little actual text content on the DM screen that you'd think it would get a few good reads before going to the press. It's not the end of the world, just mildly annoying.
Am I being too harsh? I feel dirty because I love 5th ed. so much; maybe too much.
Last edited: