A Wand Wielding Warlock Wonders...

[starwed]

I think it doesn't mention the save because it only lists what is different from confusion.

Yes, that's why I said it was an oversight. Because unlike similiar spells, it doesn't say:

This spell functions like name of spell, except that...

Instead it states:

This spell causes a single creature to become confused for 1 round. See the confusion spell, above, to determine the exact effect on the subject.

So technically, it doesn't assume any attributes of the confusion spell; you just look at that spell to see the exact effects of being confused. I seriously doubt it's intentional, though, especially given the lack of a spell resistance entry.

 

[Hypersmurf]

So here's a question... why does a Bard spell have a Divine Focus?

I'm away from my PHB... does it say the same thing?

-Hyp.

 

[irdeggman]

So here's a question... why does a Bard spell have a Divine Focus?

I'm away from my PHB... does it say the same thing?

-Hyp.

Stealth errata Alert.

The SRD and 1st printing both have the DF for the bard only spell, while the Special edition does not.

This is getting redundently obscene

 

[Pinotage]

I think it doesn't mention the save because it only lists what is different from confusion.

Yip. It does require a save. I've always found spells in wands that require saves are just not great because the DCs are so low. DC 11 for a 1st level spell is just too easy to get around.

Pinotage