Adult: GUCK Development Forum again

[SinbadBleu]

Breast Size 1A

Well my intention was not to get into specifics either. The size would the average for that race. Let say for example a human is average size in the breasts.

If she was able to increase the size to say above average(one size larger), she might get a plus one to sedection rolls.

If she was two sizes larger she would get a plus two to seductions rolls.

Anything larger than two sizes larger than your race would get you negatives on your seduction rolls, unless the seductee was a breast fetishist.<G>

If you think that size does not matter in Breasts well you need to talk to the Dancers In Bars, topless or not. Bigger Breasts mean bigger tips. Even the ones that have been enhanced beyond the limits still garner more in tips than their smaller natural? equiped sisters.

I have heard from guys that they prefer small breasts but I have found on many occasions when a large breasted women trys to seduce them the guys do not turn them down.

You have posted feats that increase the size on mans penis, you could have the same for breasts.

Besides my wife has told me more than once when she talked amoung the girls it is not the length but the thickness that gives them increased pleasure. Unless she was Size Queen.

You also have those that like the kink of having breast sex/intercourse. Yes if would be harder for the female to orgasm but not impossible. ie a higher DC.

I will gather to gether some more ideas on the vein.

 

[Bastoche]

Re: Breast Size 1A

Well my intention was not to get into specifics either. The size would the average for that race. Let say for example a human is average size in the breasts.

Even this is too specific IMO.

If she was able to increase the size to say above average(one size larger), she might get a plus one to sedection rolls.

We do not consider seduction rolls. This is left to the DM on purpose. The mechanic suggested here only treats sexual acts. What comes before and after is left to each group of players. The consensus here, if I'm not mistaken is that seduction, love, etc should be treated throughout roleplay and not rollplay.

You have posted feats that increase the size on mans penis, you could have the same for breasts.

Like I said above, this is treated because it has a direct influence on the sex act. And not the breast size.

You also have those that like the kink of having breast sex/intercourse. Yes if would be harder for the female to orgasm but not impossible. ie a higher DC.

This would already be covered by the kinks mechanics suggested by VVrayven.

Don't forget that NO mechanics suggested here is intended on what comes a few minutes before the clothes are dropped. We only treat what happens during intercourse. No seduction, love, etc mechanics.

 

[SinbadBleu]

OK thank your for the clarification on the specifics of this topic.

Has the female clitorus size been taken into effect?

Yes it is specific to the act of sex and orgasm.

 

[Bastoche]

No, but I guess it could. Let's not get too anal (pun intended ) about the details though.

 

[Psyckosama]

Well, one thing I could see mattering on the female side is vaginal tightness... lets be honest, while she might have alot more ranks in sex based skills, I seriously doubt the old dock-side whore (who's probelly as loose as an wet paper bag) is a better lay then the cherry princess/farmers daughter...

 

[SinbadBleu]

Well, one thing I could see mattering on the female side is vaginal tightness... lets be honest, while she might have alot more ranks in sex based skills, I seriously doubt the old dock-side whore (who's probelly as loose as an wet paper bag) is a better lay then the cherry princess/farmers daughter...

Well that cherry princess have what one rank of sex based skills maybe, the farmers daughter be generous three ranks, and the dock side whore would have six ranks one being the ability to shrink that wet paper bag into a finger cote. I would much prefer the dock side whore, more experience, less likely to form a permanent attachement.

I would hope that in a fantasy role playing world, our present day holdovers from bygone days would not exist, like have to marry a virgin.

 

[Sorn]

Yes, let's not get too detail oriented here. Otherwise it won't be D&D, it'll be Rolemaster 2nd Edition, where it could take forever to fill out all your physical stats, from shoe size to hat size.

 

[Asher]

Question: can breast size and the like be handled as fetishs/frets, or must a fetish/fret be a particular action or technique? It seems reasonable that if a DM and/or player really really wanted to work breast size as a factor into the mechanics, that would be one low-impact way to do it.

 

[Sorn]

Sure, Breasts could easily be added to the fetish/fret list. I still don't think we need a table for breast sizes. A character with special breast ideals will most likely ask about them when the DM introduces the partner anyway.

 

[VVrayven]

::taps foot waiting for DbS::

Anyways:

Sure, Breasts could easily be added to the fetish/fret list. I still don't think we need a table for breast sizes. A character with special breast ideals will most likely ask about them when the DM introduces the partner anyway.

I agree completely.

I am against a table that includes anything for breast size, body measurements, phallus size, vagina size, and the like. I think it is limiting, way too detailed for the scope of this guide and the simple size reference chart we will have with size classes and (half-steps) is already almost too detailed. (remember KISS)

Well, one thing I could see mattering on the female side is vaginal tightness... lets be honest, while she might have alot more ranks in sex based skills, I seriously doubt the old dock-side whore (who's probelly as loose as an wet paper bag) is a better lay then the cherry princess/farmers daughter...

::long sigh:: Okay, this would not only introduce a whole new set of controversial rules (which I'm okay with, seeing as I think we still need to hammer out NC...) I'm with SinbadBleu on this one and think that this approach is not a good idea. And speaking as a girl on the whole tightness thing... Yes some of it does go away with time, but it doesn't make a whole lot of difference, at least not in any serious degree. And if you don't think an experienced girl can be a better "lay" than a virgin who doesn't know anything, I pray for your sexual satisfaction.

No hard feelings intended, I just dislike the opinion that experienced men are better in bed, but that experienced "loose" women are not just because they have been around.

It's been too quiet around here. We need some more stuff flying! <gets to work>. That's it for now. <hugs to all>