Adventures in Cormyr (Recruitment Closed)

Not really thrilled about the idea (especially the evil part of it), but if the majority wants to go that way, then go ahead. ;)

Bye
Thanee
 

log in or register to remove this ad

So far I tally the votes as follows.

Rhun: Interested
Bloodweaver: Interested, especially if I tweak the bardic abilities to make them usable. Cautiously Interested
Jemal: Keen as beans
Legildur: No objections, happy to play especially if there is the possibility of redemption at the end.
Stonegod: I'm really not sure if Stonegod is interested or not :heh: Cautiously Interested
Thanee: Not that keen on playing an evil character
~~~~

Does this sum up your preferences correctly?
 
Last edited:

Lord_Raven88 said:
Stonegod: I'm really not sure if stonegod is interested or not :heh:
Vardin's concept is built around the razor balance of trying to use evil to fight it without being corrupted; losing to it has some RP potential. The struggle for possible redemption also has possibility, and is partially what Vardrin is trying for currently. Thus, the idea has strong resonance with my concept. That being said, it would depend on what 'flavor' of evil we were going for here---the closer we get to the "Vile"TM version, the less sanguine about it I'd become (yes, pun intended).

So call me cautiously interested.
 


stonegod said:
Vardin's concept is built around the razor balance of trying to use evil to fight it without being corrupted; losing to it has some RP potential. The struggle for possible redemption also has possibility, and is partially what Vardrin is trying for currently. Thus, the idea has strong resonance with my concept. That being said, it would depend on what 'flavor' of evil we were going for here---the closer we get to the "Vile"TM version, the less sanguine about it I'd become (yes, pun intended).

So call me cautiously interested.
Thanks for that, like you I'm not interested in this type of game descending into the Vile sort of as portrayed in the BoVD. So I wouldn't countenance rape, sexual abuse, child molestation etc.

I do think it's possible for us to RP evil without having to stoop to debase vile acts.

It seems that most of you are fine with the concept per se, but how do we want to handle this. Would you rather I incorporate this into a future adventure, or would you rather I run it seperately while you guys the first option to make characters.

If we go for the latter option then I'd want you to make a group of characters who're actively working for a church of some kind, then after an adventure or two I would incorporate the the vampiric adventure and then take it from there.

Again I thinks it's important to do at least one adventure as the good guys, so that the personality traits and quirks have been solidly established. That way you'll actually have something to contrast your evilness off against.

BTW if you do become Vampires, you'll be falling under the sway of a visionary (in his mind) very Lawful[/i] Evil vampire who is hell-bent on establishing a new better society for vampires and there prey.

Let me know your preferences.
 

Lord_Raven88 said:
OOC: There are three ogres and one human that you know of. Also I wait to see what the others want to do, before handling your fascinate attempt.
OOC: No problem if the Fascinate does not happen then she will prepare to cast T. H. Laughter on one Ogre. DC 14 vs Will Save.

Vampires: I am more inclinded for that to be a seperate adventure with different characters. However, I will play along with whatever the group decides as a whole.

-Blood
 




OOC: What about Lyric? Nira's companion. Will she be able to hear/see anything via Lyric? If not, she will move Lyric into ease-droping range that provides a protective over hang.

-Blood
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top