Havlo said:I know more about FR, enough to get the feel and pick up on the tone, but haven't done so with Greyhawk. I have the LGG and will read over it. The impression I get from reading posts is a little vanilla, but as I said I don't know much yet.
My dad's an English professor . . . there's an old joke in their trade, about the student who didn't like Shakespeare because it's so full of cliches. Greyhawk is like that as D&D settings go . . . it's vanilla because it's the original setting of role playing (pace those who say Blackmoor, as it was not readily available until 3.5e).
Havlo said:I like Greyhawk for the fact that the mythology and names are already there and the fact that my players don't know much either gives me a little leeway if I need to fudge things.
Greyhawk is designed to be open to fudging and DM invention. So are Blackmoor and Wilderlands -- old school gaming wasn't much on consistent tone, other than a tone of "fun" fantasy.