Hence the distinction between copyright & trademark in these discussions.the Supreme Court actually ruled against him for doing that.
Hence the distinction between copyright & trademark in these discussions.the Supreme Court actually ruled against him for doing that.
There’s a lot of people in this world who have creative impulses but have limitations that inhibit their expression of them.I cannot imagine a person with no creative ability even wanting to make art tbh. If they arent creative, what would drive them to try to create?
You are not.On a side note, am I the only bothered when people who use AI for everything keep calling themselves "creators"?
That's exactly what I said.You're no more a creator than I am a chef when I order a meal.
Just wanted to "ditto" this.We don't need more small creators as much as well need more good small creators. Reliance on AI art, let alone writing, doesn't help a creator get better and it tends to drown the people who actually take the time to make something with care.
If you honestly believe a musician following sheet music is just an instructions processor, no different than a mindless robot, then I see no point in continuing this conversation. Have a nice day.Correct. The original idea and human creative intent all comes from the recipe writer.
After that, it matters not whether the recipe is then followed by a robot or a human, provided each executes that recipe precisely. Either one is, at that point, just an instructions processor; similar to a pianist perfectly playing sheet music exactly as the sheet tells him to.
Just like the AI generator is producing art as instructed by deatiled and amended prompts. It's just a tool at that point; the creativity all came from the mind of the person visualizing the desired image then writing the prompts that (ideally) tell the machine to produce that image.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.