All Aboard the Invisible Railroad!

What if I told you it was possible to lock your players on a tight railroad, but make them think every decision they made mattered?

What if I told you it was possible to lock your players on a tight railroad, but make them think every decision they made mattered?

away-1020200_960_720.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

While this may sound like the evil GM speaking, I have my reasons. Firstly, not every GM has time to craft a massive campaign. There are also plenty of GMs who are daunted at the prospect of having to figure out every eventuality. So, this advice is offered to help people scale down the pressure of being a GM and give them options to reuse and recycle their ideas and channel players through an exciting adventure that just doesn’t have as many options as they thought it did. All I’m suggesting here is a way to make sure every choice the players make takes them to an awesome encounter, which is surly no bad thing.

A Caveat​

I should add that used too often this system can have the opposite effect. The important thing here is not to take away their feeling of agency. If players realise nothing they do changes the story, then the adventure will quickly lose its allure. But as long as they don’t realise what is happening they will think every choice matters and the story is entirely in their hands. However, I should add that some players are used to being led around by the nose, or even prefer it, so as long as no one points out the “emperor has no clothes” everyone will have a great game.

You See Three Doors…​

This is the most basic use of the invisible railroad: you offer a choice and whichever choice they pick it is the same result. Now, this only works if they don’t get to check out the other doors. So this sort of choice needs to only allow one option and no take backs. This might be that the players know certain death is behind the other two doors ("Phew, thank gods we picked the correct one there!"). The other option is for a monotone voice to announce “the choice has been made” and for the other doors to lock or disappear.

If you use this too often the players will start to realise what is going on. To a degree you are limiting their agency by making them unable to backtrack. So only lock out the other options if it looks likely they will check them out. If they never go and check then you don’t need to stop them doing so.

The Ten Room Dungeon​

This variant on the idea above works with any dungeon, although it might also apply to a village or any place with separate encounters. Essentially, you create ten encounters/rooms and whichever door the player character’s open leads to the next one on your list. You can create as complex a dungeon map as you like, and the player characters can try any door in any order. But whatever door they open after room four will always lead to room five.

In this way the players will think there is a whole complex they may have missed, and if they backtrack you always have a new room ready for them, it’s just the next one on the list. The downside is that all the rooms will need to fit to roughly the same dimensions if someone is mapping. But if no one is keeping track you can just go crazy.

Now, this may go against the noble art of dungeon design, but it does offer less wastage. There are also some GMs who create dungeons that force you to try every room, which is basically just visible railroading. This way the players can pick any door and still visit every encounter.

This idea also works for any area the player characters are wandering about randomly. You might populate a whole village with only ten NPCs because unless the characters are looking for someone specific that will just find the next one of your preset NPCs regardless of which door they knock on.

What Path Do You Take in the Wilderness?​

When you take away doors and corridors it might seem more complex, but actually it makes the invisible railroad a lot easier. The player characters can pick any direction (although they may still pick a physical path). However, it is unlikely they will cross into another environmental region even after a day’s walk. So as long as your encounters are not specific to a forest or mountain they should all suit “the next encounter.”

So, whichever direction the players decide to go, however strange and off the beaten path, they will encounter the same monster or ruins as if they went in any other direction. Essentially a wilderness is automatically a ‘ten room dungeon’ just with fewer walls.

As with any encounter you can keep things generic and add an environmentally appropriate skin depending on where you find it. So it might be forest trolls or mountain trolls depending on where they are found, but either way its trolls. When it comes to traps and ruins it’s even easier as pretty much anything can be built anywhere and either become iced up or overgrown depending on the environment.

Before You Leave the Village…​

Sometimes the easiest choice is no choice at all. If the player characters have done all they need to do in “the village” (or whatever area they are in) they will have to move on to the next one. So while they might procrastinate, explore, do some shopping, you know which major plot beat they are going to follow next. Anything they do beforehand will just be a side encounter you can probably improvise or draw from your backstock of generic ones. You need not spend too long on these as even the players know these are not important. The next piece of the “proper adventure” is whenever they leave the village so they won’t expect anything beyond short and sweet. In fact, the less detailed the encounters the more the GM will be assumed to be intimating it is time to move on.

Following the Clues​

Finally we come to the most common invisible railroad that isn’t ever considered railroading (ironically). Investigative adventures usually live and breathe by allowing the player characters to uncover clues that lead to other clues. Such adventures are actually openly railroading as each clue leads to another on a proscribed path. The players aren’t forced to follow the clues, but what else are they going to do? The players are making a point of following the railroad in the knowledge it will take them to the denouement of the adventure. What makes this type of railroading entertaining is that the players feel clever for having found the clues that lead them along the path. So if they start to divert too much the GM can put another clue on their path or let them find the next one a little easier and you are back on track.

The "Good" Kind of Railroading​

Now, all this may all seem a little manipulative, but modifying events in reaction to what the players do is a part of many GM’s tools. Any trick you use is usually okay as long as you do it to serve the story and the player’s enjoyment.

That said, never take away player agency so you can ensure the story plays out the way you want it to. This sort of railroading should only be used just to make the game more manageable and free up the GM to concentrate on running a good game instead of desperately trying to create contingencies. So, remember that you must never restrict the choices and agency of the players, at least knowingly. But it is fine to make sure every road goes where you want it to, as long as that is to somewhere amazing.

Your Turn: How do you use railroading in your games?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Andrew Peregrine

Andrew Peregrine

There is an interview with Crawford on the Challenge in DnD, release near the launch of monter of the multiverse.
He clearly say that the DM can make vanish or add hit points to a monster during a fight.
Not before, during a fight.
That is my new reference to railroad issue.
I mean, yes, the GM absolutely can do that. Whether that is a good idea is another matter entirely. But I can certainly imagine situations and playstyles in which it would be beneficial on occasion. A newbie GM underestimating how dangerous a monster they chose was and didn't want a TPK comes to mind. Routinely doing this, as well as other fudging, probably indicates that the system is not suited for your needs though.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
So what is happening here is that a player is declaring an action; the GM has already decided the outcome (ie nothing useful happens); and the GM is not telling the player that straight-up, but rather is allowing the player to proceed as if the search for the clue, door, etc is meaningful. That seems to fit the definition of "railroading" and "illusionism" being used in this thread.
Not necessarily. If the DM knows that nothing is up there because he already knows where the useful information is, he is not forcing the PC down his path and invalidating agency. The player has full agency to climb the tree and look or not, the DM simply knows the answer to the what the player is seeking in advance and can tell him. There's no illusionism involved. There's no railroading involved.

If on the other hand there was a clue up the tree, but the DM felt that the PCs were going to find it too soon and moved it in response to the declaration to go search, THAT would be railroading. The DM would be invalidating the choice to search and forcing the story in the direction he wants it to go.

That's the big difference.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
There is an interview with Crawford on the Challenge in DnD, release near the launch of monter of the multiverse.
He clearly say that the DM can make vanish or add hit points to a monster during a fight.
Not before, during a fight.
That is my new reference to railroad issue.
It’s not what I would call “railroading,” but it’s definitely a technique I would take serious issue with, for similar reasons.
 

I mean, yes, the GM absolutely can do that. Whether that is a good idea is another matter entirely. But I can certainly imagine situations and playstyles in which it would be beneficial on occasion. A newbie GM underestimating how dangerous a monster they chose was and didn't want a TPK comes to mind. Routinely doing this, as well as other fudging, probably indicates that the system is not suited for your needs though.
forget newbie... I can imagine someone dropping 5 shadows (CR2) on a 8th level party just to find that with bounded accuracy the shadows can still hit, and when they hit the 8 str rouge with a crit for 5 str dropping him to a 3, then on the next round hit him again for dead even though he still had 40hp might have to decide the shadow 'miss' no matter what they roll after that.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
forget newbie... I can imagine someone dropping 5 shadows (CR2) on a 8th level party just to find that with bounded accuracy the shadows can still hit, and when they hit the 8 str rouge with a crit for 5 str dropping him to a 3, then on the next round hit him again for dead even though he still had 40hp might have to decide the shadow 'miss' no matter what they roll after that.
DMs should be taught encounter planning like gun safety: Never point a monster at a character unless you’re willing to pull the trigger.
 


Thomas Shey

Legend
forget newbie... I can imagine someone dropping 5 shadows (CR2) on a 8th level party just to find that with bounded accuracy the shadows can still hit, and when they hit the 8 str rouge with a crit for 5 str dropping him to a 3, then on the next round hit him again for dead even though he still had 40hp might have to decide the shadow 'miss' no matter what they roll after that.

Though honestly, these days I still think saying "Guys, I misjudged this something horrible, lets do a rewind here" is the better choice and disrupting the flow be damned.
 

Though honestly, these days I still think saying "Guys, I misjudged this something horrible, lets do a rewind here" is the better choice and disrupting the flow be damned.
yeah I actually agree with this. "opps" happen.

BUT it depends on the game and the group really... I would not mind if the DM said "Yeah, that didn't happen"
 

Thomas Shey

Legend
DMs should be taught encounter planning like gun safety: Never point a monster at a character unless you’re willing to pull the trigger.

The problem is when you think you have a pellet gun and discover its a .357 Magnum. At some point in getting used to a given game system that can happen to anyone. Its why I tend to be extremely cautious when applying opponents with unusual abilities or tricks until I'm really, really experienced with a system, but not everyone has been GMing for 40 years.
 


Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top