Aeolius
Adventurer
22) Galley-Oh-Hoop-Hoop (more info on the GOHH here )
Klaus said:"Depending on the world" is saying something on the matter.
All I'm saying is that if it's never asked and never comes up during the game, the default shouldn't be "rape", if we want to broaden up the scope, but rather "unlikely couple got together".
Kahuna Burger said:I've always hated the phrase "women and children" and would prefer to hear about "children and elderly" or at least "mothers and children" implying the non combatant females are pregnant or nursing at the time.
I believe you've just written the plot of The Simpsons or nearly every family sitcom for the last 10 (20? 30?) years, except maybe for the "inherently evil" part.But could you not imagine a human woman saying, "You know what? He's ugly, he smells, he's unreliable, he's got the interpersonal skills of a well-hefted housebrick, and he's inherently evil... but I really think I can change him!" ?
This board isn't the place to discuss real-life incidents of rape. Please keep discussion on the basis of fantasy, not the real world.prosfilaes said:To take a real-life example, I would suspect that very few of the interracial children in antebellum South were romantic meetings; I suspect the most common thing was that one partner accepted because it wasn't in their best interest to object.
My vision of orcs came from Tolkien and (perhaps not surprisingly) I think Peter Jackson's outfit came a lot closer than Erol Otis, or whomever it was who did the old 1e MM illustration. I always kinda ignored the 'pig-headed' description.S'mon said:I guess it's because my vision of 'orc' is irrevocably the pig-headed guy in the 1e Monster Manual that I have trouble envisioning romantic attraction to the critters.![]()