Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: An overview of BESM d20
Wulf Ratbane said:
If their effects are not described in d20 terms, then they are not d20 compatible-- and in fact, are probably not even very useful. At that point who really cares if they are Open or not?
I think you worry needlessly.
Have you read my exemples?
Those are not d20 per se, but can have a game effect.
and I worry because GoO doesn't produce a lot of product per year, and some project get pushed and pushed (like Uresia, which I'll buy if it gets out), so having the possibility that other publisher could do derivative product without problem (like netbooks of characters or monsters or vehicles or spells) is important to me.
Though I understand that GoO would prefer to do it themselves, or that they reserve the possibility.
Plus, could you exactly points to me where it is said that rules compatible with OGC has to be OGC?
"including translations and derivative works under copyright law"
As far as I'm concerned rules can't be copyrighted, the derivative work include only derivative text.
edit: like feat and such, but you could do something like the kata in way of the samurai and close them:
Way of The magical Bean
By concentrating during one minutes, you focus yourself with the magic in beans, this allow you to use beans to produce a magic-missile spell effect of your character level.
Xp: 50
I do not think that this could be considered like
derivative, it uses similar terms "magic-missile", "character level", but those are
prior art and can't be declared OGC, thus it isn't derivative of OGC and can be closed.
PS: IANAL
