Dungannon said:
And now the WAC has 4 teams bowl-eligible, which is the same as the Big East. The Mountain West has 5, Conference USA has 6, and the MAC has 7. Which just goes to prove my theory that the only reason the Big East was ever included in the BCS was because of Miami U.
It's definetly a down year in the Big East. But when the BCS was founded, Miami, Syracuse, and Virginia Tech had about equal chances of winning the conference in any given year. And Pitt, West Virginia, and BC were dangerous spoilers (lets not talk about Rutgers until very recently and Temple ever); it wasn't Miami and the seven dwarfs.
1)
There are only 8 teams in the Big East. UConn could become bowl-eligible by upsetting Louisville to give the Big East 5 bowl-eligible teams; which would be proporiantely better than C-USA (6 of 12), the MWC (5 of 9), the MAC (7 of 12), the Pac 10 (5 of 10), SEC (6 of 12), the Sun Belt (2 of 8), or the WAC (4 of 9), and only percentage points behind the Big Ten's 7 of 11. Heck, getting half of its teams bowl-eligbile is exactly what happened in C-USA, the Pac 10, and the SEC. Only the ACC, Big 10, and Big 12 got better than 5/8ths of their teams in bowls... and I think I can safely say that this year's Big 12 or ACC is not something the Big East wants to emulate.
2) If you think UConn or Pitt wouldn't be bowl-eligible in C-USA or the MAC (and probably contending for the conference title), you're on crack.