And then there were 8! On Chris Sims and Jennifer Clarke Wilkes' Layoffs...

I've seen quite a few people speculating that Chris Sims and Jennifer Clarke-Wilkes may not have been made redundant, but possibly fired for various reasons, or because contracts ended (given that Jennifer has been at WoTC for about 15 years, that latter guess was always going to be very unlikely!). For that reason, I feel it's a good idea to set things straight and find out exactly what happened; I'm sure neither want rumours like that to start! The short version: yep, they were lay-offs.

Chris Sims kindly shared with me that "Jennifer Clarke Wilkes and I were laid off on Wednesday the 28th. Our positions were eliminated, reducing the D&D team to eight people working directly on the tabletop game."

Hopefully that will put some speculation to rest! Here's the original article, for context.

Who makes up the 8 still working on the RPG? Mike Mearls, Rodney Thompson, Jeremy Crawford, Greg Bilsland, Chris Perkins, Peter Lee, Matt Sernett, Adam Lee.

The 8 does not include art or brand staff, including community manager Trevor Kidd, brand/marketing managers, Organized Play program managers and the like, which brings the number up to about 13.

As an interesting point of comparison, Paizo CEO Lisa Stevens kindly shared that "We don't have any part time employees. The 25 full-time were folks that worked directly on Pathfinder products in design, development, editing and art. Currently, we are pushing 60 employees in the company and growing. In the next few months, we will be hiring more editors and developers to support Pathfinder. 2014 was our best year ever in both sales and profits. Still going up!"
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Don't forget the veritable treasure trove WotC is sitting on: dndclassics.com. They could have a small team working on conversion documents which unlock the old stuff to new gamers. Publish it piecemeal on the web site and advertise the PDFs as well.

This isn't perfect for the old guard who already have the old books, but if the 5e core books are really a big success, it could be a viable strategy for the next one or two years.

If the movie rights got resolved, they could go for movie tie-in stuff, too: a FR setting book based on a Drizzt movie, e.g.

I have long since wanted to stop second guessing WotC strategy, but I just can't do so.:)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I dont think this is a big deal. How many writers do they need with no books on the horizon. Just pump out the monthly column, bring back dungeon, and OGL the rest. Cool beans.
 



Maybe not in the 1990s. Nowadays? Absolutely.

I don't think so. You've got only a fraction, probably a small minority, of the 5e playing public on these boards. You have, at best, a significant minority of the folks on these boards who are impatient and irritated with the lack of info, with just many folks saying they have no problem. So you just have a fraction of a fraction complaining. Further, it's a fraction of a subset of people self-selected to be interested in news and announcements far ahead of release. The vast majority of WotC's customers are happy playing with their new books, and happy to hear announcements of new products shortly before release.
 

I don't think so. You've got only a fraction, probably a small minority, of the 5e playing public on these boards. You have, at best, a significant minority of the folks on these boards who are impatient and irritated with the lack of info, with just many folks saying they have no problem. So you just have a fraction of a fraction complaining. Further, it's a fraction of a subset of people self-selected to be interested in news and announcements far ahead of release. The vast majority of WotC's customers are happy playing with their new books, and happy to hear announcements of new products shortly before release.


I agree with this. Most people I play with in real life don't hang out on forum boards.
 

I don't think so. You've got only a fraction, probably a small minority, of the 5e playing public on these boards. You have, at best, a significant minority of the folks on these boards who are impatient and irritated with the lack of info, with just many folks saying they have no problem. So you just have a fraction of a fraction complaining. Further, it's a fraction of a subset of people self-selected to be interested in news and announcements far ahead of release. The vast majority of WotC's customers are happy playing with their new books, and happy to hear announcements of new products shortly before release.


It's written and searchable and there forever. It's almost worse than old press. Information is found and read based on the keywords contained within not based on where one believes that populations reside online. When someone looks for info on "The Book of Cool Stuff" they find it everywhere it exists and the places where it is most contentious often show up higher in the lists. Your impressions about what a vast majority of customers might like or might not like are not relevant to what good and bad press can do to potential customers.

I agree with this. Most people I play with in real life don't hang out on forum boards.

I know of almost no one these days who doesn't first scope out a potential purchase online.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

I know of almost no one these days who doesn't first scope out a potential purchase online.

I normally agree with you, and of course, in your experience you are not wrong.

However, nobody but me in my group of seven does that.

So experiences vary.
 



Remove ads

Remove ads

Top