Garnfellow
Explorer
Several months ago -- I think during a debate on the merits of 3.5 -- someone made the very astute observation that animate object really ought to be a wizard spell. Consider the example of Mickey Mouse in Fantasia.
At the time, I thought this was brilliant. In over 20 years of playing different incarnations of D&D, this oversight had never once occurred to me -- but it's been nagging at the back of my mind ever since.
So now I've got a high level wizard NPC who like to make constructs. It seems like animate objects would be a natural addition to his repertoire.
Does anyone see any hidden problems with making animate objects a 6th-level wizard spell?
At the time, I thought this was brilliant. In over 20 years of playing different incarnations of D&D, this oversight had never once occurred to me -- but it's been nagging at the back of my mind ever since.
So now I've got a high level wizard NPC who like to make constructs. It seems like animate objects would be a natural addition to his repertoire.
Does anyone see any hidden problems with making animate objects a 6th-level wizard spell?