Another Immortals Handbook thread

[Fieari]

10,000 for AMC +1 seems a little cheap to me. That sounds affordable to someone at something like 10th level. I'd say start the numbers off much higher or you'll see these epic items as a staple of lower level gaming. I can practically see the CharOp board salivating at the thought of being able to quicken every spell for free for a mere 160,000.

 

[DDM]

I vote you stop bragging about your design-fu skills and finish your work before you die alone and unloved in a gutter like Mozart did!

I don't know why but this is the post I liked the most.
So, U_K, what about putting some more "action" and less "thought" ?
Oh, and for the votes, my humble opinion would be for the first two, for some of those same reasons already written on these boards. But since I want you to decide, then IF my vote creates a balance, then change it and put it to the highest vote pool.

 

[Anabstercorian]

I don't know why but this is the post I liked the most.

I thought it struck a nice balance between complimentary comparison and naked contempt.

 

[Sledge]

Okay I'm thinking that some people are missing my point here. A ring of wizardry double's your spell slots of a certain level. So a ring of AMC Wizardry would double your slots with the AMC allowed on each slot. So you take the standard 9 rings of wizardry and you throw on the amount of AMC you want allowed on each slot, with the understanding that it only doubles what you have. So having +10 AMC on a ring of wizardry IX when you only have AMC twice would only allow you to use AMC twice. The other 8 AMC is waste until you catch up with the ring. To do it otherwise will quickly result in imbalance.

 

[Pssthpok]

Hey, UK,

How would your feelings on absolutes affect, say, a Cheribum's 1st Choir traits? That gives him a lot of immunites... Would you factor their Divine Traits with that at all? Like, make them resistant to the first 24 negative levels/ability drain-damage from each attack? Just curious, because after having looked at the Bestiary, you have a lot of FIND+REPLACE moves to make, I think.

 

[Cheiromancer]

Hey UK!

You had best harass your ISP a bit more. If they haven't responded to your email in a week, they've probably lost it.

-Cheiro

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hey, UK,

Hiya mate!

How would your feelings on absolutes affect, say, a Cheribum's 1st Choir traits? That gives him a lot of immunites... Would you factor their Divine Traits with that at all? Like, make them resistant to the first 24 negative levels/ability drain-damage from each attack? Just curious, because after having looked at the Bestiary, you have a lot of FIND+REPLACE moves to make, I think.

Well, if I were to implement the changes as standard I would remove all immunities.

Energy Immunity would be replaced with energy resistance.
They would be protected from Ability Drain and Energy Drain equal to their Divine Bonus.

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hey UK!

Hey Cheiromancer dude!

You had best harass your ISP a bit more. If they haven't responded to your email in a week, they've probably lost it.

I don't understand whats going on myself. This is the first time I have ever had any problems with them and they generally respond within 24 hours.


By the way I meant to ask, does anyone have the fonts:

ScalaSans - Regular
ScalaSans - Bold

I use ScalaSans LF Regular in the Bestiary but I don't think the pdf shows up the bold text because I don't have the bold font - even though the text is bold on my screen.

 

[Anubis]

What's Automatic Metamagic Capacity? I haven't heard of that feat, or haven't found it.

 

[Verequus]

That's a new feat from the Bestiary - or it is on Upper_Krust's website. Or it could be in both locations. I'm too lazy to check that out now. :\